BACKGROUND: The Ask, Advise, Refer (AAR) model of intervening with patients who use tobacco promotes a brief office-based intervention plus referral to a tobacco quitline. However, there is little evidence that this model is effective. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on patients' tobacco use of two levels of a dental office-based intervention compared with usual care. METHODS: The authors randomly assigned 68 private dental clinics to one of three conditions: 5 As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange); 3 As (AAR model); or usual care, and they enrolled 2,160 participants. RESULTS: At the 12-month assessment, compared with those in usual care, participants in the two intervention conditions combined were more likely to report cessation of tobacco use, as measured by nine-month prolonged abstinence (3 percent versus 2 percent; F(1,66) = 3.97, P < .10) and 12-month point prevalence (12 percent versus 8 percent; F(1,66) = 7.32, P < .01). There were no significant differences between participants in the clinics using the 5 As and 3 As strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are inconclusive as to whether referrals to a quitline add value to brief dental office-based interventions. Patients receiving telephone counseling quit tobacco use at higher rates, but only a small percentage of those proactively referred actually received counseling. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results confirm those of previous research: that training dental practitioners to provide brief tobacco-use cessation advice and assistance results in a change in their behavior, and that these practitioners are effective in helping their patients to quit using tobacco.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Ask, Advise, Refer (AAR) model of intervening with patients who use tobacco promotes a brief office-based intervention plus referral to a tobacco quitline. However, there is little evidence that this model is effective. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on patients' tobacco use of two levels of a dental office-based intervention compared with usual care. METHODS: The authors randomly assigned 68 private dental clinics to one of three conditions: 5 As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange); 3 As (AAR model); or usual care, and they enrolled 2,160 participants. RESULTS: At the 12-month assessment, compared with those in usual care, participants in the two intervention conditions combined were more likely to report cessation of tobacco use, as measured by nine-month prolonged abstinence (3 percent versus 2 percent; F(1,66) = 3.97, P < .10) and 12-month point prevalence (12 percent versus 8 percent; F(1,66) = 7.32, P < .01). There were no significant differences between participants in the clinics using the 5 As and 3 As strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are inconclusive as to whether referrals to a quitline add value to brief dental office-based interventions. Patients receiving telephone counseling quit tobacco use at higher rates, but only a small percentage of those proactively referred actually received counseling. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results confirm those of previous research: that training dental practitioners to provide brief tobacco-use cessation advice and assistance results in a change in their behavior, and that these practitioners are effective in helping their patients to quit using tobacco.
Authors: John R Hughes; Josue P Keely; Ray S Niaura; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Robyn L Richmond; Gary E Swan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jeffrey G Willett; Nancy E Hood; Emily K Burns; Joyce L Swetlick; Steven M Wilson; Darryl A Lang; Arnold H Levinson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Judith S Gordon; Julie Armin; Melanie D Hingle; Peter Giacobbi; James K Cunningham; Thienne Johnson; Kristopher Abbate; Carol L Howe; Denise J Roe Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Richard Holliday; Bosun Hong; Elaine McColl; Jonathan Livingstone-Banks; Philip M Preshaw Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Thomas K Houston; Kathryn L Delaughter; Midge N Ray; Gregg H Gilbert; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe; Julie E Volkman Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 2.757