Literature DB >> 20675318

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Alicia Bueno1, Francisco Acín, Cristina Cañibano, Jose L Fernandez-Casado, E Castillo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive techniques such as duplex ultrasound (DU) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) are valid alternatives in the preoperative evaluation of such patients. Our aim is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA and DU in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent DU, hybrid CE-MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Magnetic resonance angiography and DSA images were evaluated independently and in a blinded fashion. Every segment was graded as normal, stenosed less than 50%, stenosed more than 50%, or occluded.
RESULTS: There were 1720 segments for analysis. Duplex ultrasound depicting stenosis >50% demonstrated a sensitivity (S) 81.4%, specificity (E) 99%, positive predictive value (PPV) 96.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 94.8%. Occlusions showed S 90%, E 97%, PPV 98.1%, and NPV 88.4%. Magnetic resonance angiography depicting stenosis >50% demonstrated a S 91%, E 99%, PPV 96.7%, and NPV 97.6%. Occlusions showed S 95.4%, E 98%, PPV 98.4%, and NPV 94.7%.
CONCLUSION: Combined CE-MRA and DU is the first diagnostic approach in the preoperative assessment of PAD, leading to the use of DSA for selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675318     DOI: 10.1177/1538574410377018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  3 in total

1.  Peripheral arterial disease in a symptomatic diabetic population: prospective comparison of rapid unenhanced MR angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  Philip A Hodnett; Emily V Ward; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; Jeremy D Collins; Christopher B Glielmi; Xiaoming Bi; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Navyash Gupta; James C Carr; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  To screen or not to screen? The development of a prediction model for aorto-iliac stenosis in kidney transplant candidates.

Authors:  Elsaline Rijkse; Hongchao Qi; Shabnam Babakry; Diederik C Bijdevaate; Hendrikus J A N Kimenai; Joke I Roodnat; Jan N M IJzermans; Robert C Minnee
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in estimation of severity of peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Randall W Franz; Mark A Jump; M Chance Spalding; James J Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.