Literature DB >> 20674991

Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin.

Luiz L Mafra1, V Monica Bricelj, Katja Fennel.   

Abstract

Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. This laboratory study compares the size-specific uptake and elimination kinetics of domoic acid (DA) from Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries in two co-occurring bivalves, the oyster Crassostrea virginica and the mussel Mytilus edulis. Domoic acid concentrations were measured in visceral and non-visceral tissues of different-sized oysters and mussels during simultaneous long-term exposure to toxic P. multiseries cells in the laboratory, followed by depuration on a non-toxic algal diet. Mussels attained 7-17-fold higher DA concentrations than oysters, depending on the body size and exposure time, and also detoxified DA at higher rates (1.4-1.6 d(-1)) than oysters (0.25-0.88 d(-1)) of a comparable size. Small oysters attained markedly higher weight-specific DA concentrations (maximum=78.6 μg g(-1)) than large, market-sized individuals (≤ 13 μg g(-1)), but no clear relationship was found between body size and DA concentration in mussels (maximum=460 μg g(-1)). Therefore, differential DA accumulation by the two species was, on average, approximately 3-fold more pronounced for large bivalves. An inverse relationship between DA elimination rate and body size was established for oysters but not mussels. Elimination of DA was faster in viscera than in other tissues of both bivalves; DA exchange rate from the former to the latter was higher in oysters. The contribution of viscera to the total DA burden of mussels was consistently greater than that of other tissues during both uptake (>80%) and depuration (>65%) phases, whereas it rapidly decreased from 70-80% to 30-40% in oysters, and this occurred faster in smaller individuals. Residual DA concentrations (≤ 0.25 μg g(-1)) were detected at later depuration stages (up to 14 d), mainly in viscera of oysters and non-visceral tissues of mussels, suggesting that a second, slower-detoxifying toxin compartment exists in both species. However, a simple exponential decay model was found to adequately describe DA elimination kinetics in these bivalves. The lower capacity for DA accumulation in oysters compared to mussels can thus only be explained by the former's comparatively low toxin intake rather than faster toxin elimination. 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674991     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  14 in total

Review 1.  From the raw bar to the bench: Bivalves as models for human health.

Authors:  José A Fernández Robledo; Raghavendra Yadavalli; Bassem Allam; Emmanuelle Pales Espinosa; Marco Gerdol; Samuele Greco; Rebecca J Stevick; Marta Gómez-Chiarri; Ying Zhang; Cynthia A Heil; Adrienne N Tracy; David Bishop-Bailey; Michael J Metzger
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Management of domoic acid monitoring in shellfish from the Catalan coast.

Authors:  Gemma Giménez Papiol; Alexis Casanova; Margarita Fernández-Tejedor; Pablo de la Iglesia; Jorge Diogène
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The blue mussel Mytilus edulis is vulnerable to the toxic dinoflagellate Karlodinium armiger-Adult filtration is inhibited and several life stages killed.

Authors:  Sofie Bjørnholt Binzer; Regitze Benedicte Carlstedt Lundgreen; Terje Berge; Per Juel Hansen; Bent Vismann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Distribution of Tetrodotoxin in the New Zealand Clam, Paphies australis, Established Using Immunohistochemistry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Laura Biessy; Kirsty F Smith; Michael J Boundy; Stephen C Webb; Ian Hawes; Susanna A Wood
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  RNA-Seq Transcriptome Profiling of the Queen Scallop (Aequipecten opercularis) Digestive Gland after Exposure to Domoic Acid-Producing Pseudo-nitzschia.

Authors:  Pablo Ventoso; Antonio J Pazos; M Luz Pérez-Parallé; Juan Blanco; Juan C Triviño; José L Sánchez
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Domoic acid depuration by intertidal bivalves fed on toxin-producing Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries.

Authors:  Eva Dusek Jennings; Micaela S Parker; Charles A Simenstad
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2020-02-19

7.  Transcriptional Response in the Digestive Gland of the King Scallop (Pecten maximus) After the Injection of Domoic Acid.

Authors:  Pablo Ventoso; Antonio J Pazos; Juan Blanco; M Luz Pérez-Parallé; Juan C Triviño; José L Sánchez
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  Marine Biotoxins: Occurrence, Toxicity, Regulatory Limits and Reference Methods.

Authors:  Pierina Visciano; Maria Schirone; Miriam Berti; Anna Milandri; Rosanna Tofalo; Giovanna Suzzi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Ladder-Shaped Ion Channel Ligands: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Yuri B Shmukler; Denis A Nikishin
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Distribution of Domoic Acid in the Digestive Gland of the King Scallop Pecten maximus.

Authors:  Juan Blanco; Aida Mauríz; Gonzalo Álvarez
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.