Literature DB >> 20674911

A comparison of the effects of three different luteal phase support protocols on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Turgut Var1, Esra Ayşin Tonguc, Melike Doğanay, Cavidan Gulerman, Tayfun Gungor, Leyla Mollamahmutoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of three different luteal phase support protocols on pregnancy and implantation rates, as well as luteal phase hormone profile in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-ET cycles.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: A tertiary teaching and research hospital. PATIENT(S): Two hundred eighty-eight patients who were undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a long protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. INTERVENTION(S): Group 1 (E(2) + P) received daily P plus 4 mg of E(2), group 2 (hCG + P) received P plus 1,500 IU of hCG, and group 3 (P only) received daily vaginal P gel. Blood samples were drawn on the day of hCG administration, as well as 7 and 10 days after the hCG for the E(2) and P measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The clinical pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): No difference existed between the E(2) + P and hCG + P groups with respect to pregnancy rate, but it was significantly lower in the P-only group.The implantation rate was significantly lower in the P-only group than in the other groups.The highest miscarriage rate was in the P-only group (38%). CONCLUSION(S): In assisted reproductive technology cycles including treatment with GnRH agonist, adding 4 mg of oral E(2) to P during the luteal phase significantly increased the pregnancy and implantation rates and decreased the miscarriage rate compared with the use of P only.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674911     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 2.  Estrogen supplementation to progesterone as luteal phase support in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Mei Zhang; Fang Lv; Pin Wang; Xia-Man Huang; Kai-Feng Liu; Yu Pan; Nai-Jun Dong; Yu-Rong Ji; Hong She; Rong Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Vaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

Authors:  Kenan Sofuoglu; Ismet Gun; Sadik Sahin; Okan Ozden; Oktay Tosun; Mustafa Eroglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 4.  The Luteal Phase after GnRHa Trigger-Understanding An Enigma.

Authors:  Kathrine Leth-Moller; Sandra Hammer Jagd; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.