Literature DB >> 20674886

Performance on a simple response time task: Is sleep or work more important for miners?

Sally A Ferguson1, Gemma M Paech, Jillian Dorrian, Gregory D Roach, Sarah M Jay.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the impact of work- and sleep-related factors on an objective measure of response time in a field setting. Thirty-five mining operators working 12-h shift patterns completed daily sleep and work diaries, wore activity monitors continuously and completed palm-based psychomotor vigilance tests (palmPVT) at the start and end of each shift. Linear mixed models were used to test the main effects on response time of roster, timing of test, sleep history and prior wake. The time at which the test occurred was a significant predictor of response time (F₃(,)₄₀₃(.)₄ = 6.72, p < .01) with the end of night shifts being associated with significantly slower response times than the start of night shifts, and the start or end of day shifts. Further, the amount of sleep obtained in the 24h prior to the test was also a significant predictor of response time (F₃(,)₄₀₇(.)₀ = 3.05, p < .01). The results suggest that, as expected, the end of night shift is associated with changes in response time indicative of performance impairments. Of more interest however is that immediate sleep history was also predictive of changes in response time with lower amounts of prior sleep related to slower response times. The current data provides further evidence that sleep is a primary mediator of performance, independent of roster pattern.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674886     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  9 in total

1.  Measurement of reaction time in the home for people with dementia: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Catherine S Cole; Mark Mennemeier; James E Bost; Laura Smith-Olinde; Diane Howieson
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Exploring Worker Experience as a Predictor of Routine and Non-routine Safety Performance Outcomes in the Mining Industry.

Authors:  Cassandra L Hoebbel; Emily J Haas; Margaret E Ryan
Journal:  Min Metall Explor       Date:  2022-01-09

3.  Mineworker fatigue: A review of what we know and future decisions.

Authors:  Tim Bauerle; Zoë Dugdale; Gerald Poplin
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Prioritizing sleep for healthy work schedules.

Authors:  Masaya Takahashi
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Health behaviours of Australian fly-in, fly-out workers and partners during on-shift and off-shift days: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Amanda L Rebar; Kristie-Lee Alfrey; Benjamin Gardner; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Mental health in mine workers: a literature review.

Authors:  José Matamala Pizarro; Francisco Aguayo Fuenzalida
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.707

Review 7.  Disturbance of the Circadian System in Shift Work and Its Health Impact.

Authors:  Diane B Boivin; Philippe Boudreau; Anastasi Kosmadopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.182

8.  Effect of Shift Work on Cognitive Function in Chinese Coal Mine Workers: A Resting-State fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Fangyuan Tian; Hongxia Li; Shuicheng Tian; Jiang Shao; Chenning Tian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Advancing the sleep/wake schedule impacts the sleep of African-Americans more than European-Americans.

Authors:  Gemma M Paech; Stephanie J Crowley; Louis F Fogg; Charmane I Eastman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.