Literature DB >> 20674671

Effect of osmolarity on CSF volume during ventriculo-aqueductal and ventriculo-cisternal perfusions in cats.

Jurica Maraković1, Darko Oresković, Milan Rados, Miroslav Vukić, Ivana Jurjević, Darko Chudy, Marijan Klarica.   

Abstract

The effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) osmolarity on the CSF volume has been studied on different CSF/brain tissue contact areas. It has been shown, on anesthetized cats under normal CSF pressure, that the perfusion of CSF system (12.96 μl/min) by hyperosmolar CSF (400 mOsml/l) leads to significantly higher outflow volume (μl/min) during ventriculo-cisternal perfusion (29.36 ± 1.17 and 33.50 ± 2.78) than the ventriculo-aqueductal perfusion (19.58 ± 1.57 and 22.10 ± 2.31) in experimental period of 30 or 60 min. Both of these hyperosmolar perfusions resulted in significantly higher outflow volume than the perfusions by isoosmolar artificial CSF (12.86 ± 0.96 and 13.58 ± 1.64). These results suggest that the volume of the CSF depends on both the CSF osmolarity and the size of the contact area between CSF system and surrounding tissue exposed to hyperosmolar CSF. However, all of these facts imply that the control of the CSF volume is not in accordance with the classical hypothesis of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamic. According to this hypothesis, the CSF volume should be regulated by active formation of CSF (secretion) inside the brain ventricles and passive CSF absorption outside of the brain. Obtained results correspond to the new hypothesis which claims that the volume of CSF depends on the gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic forces between the blood on one side and extracellular fluid and CSF on the other. The CSF exchange between the entire CSF system and the surrounding tissue should, therefore, be determined by (patho)physiological conditions that predominate within those compartments.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674671     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  10 in total

1.  Cerebrospinal fluid osmolality cannot predict development or surgical outcome of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Eva Kjer Oernbo; Annette Buur Steffensen; Hanne Gredal; Helle Harding Poulsen; Nina Rostgaard; Cecilie Holm Rasmussen; Marlene Møller-Nissen; Anja Hviid Simonsen; Steen Gregers Hasselbalch; Marianne Juhler; Nanna MacAulay
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Hydrocephalus after Intrathecal Administration of Dextran to Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jason P Dufour; Kasi E Russell-Lodrigue; Lara Doyle-Meyers; Kathrine P Falkenstein; Robert V Blair; Elizabeth S Didier; Nadia Slisarenko; Kenneth C Williams; Marcelo J Kuroda
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  A computational model of cerebrospinal fluid production and reabsorption driven by Starling forces.

Authors:  Joel Buishas; Ian G Gould; Andreas A Linninger
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 4.  Research into the Physiology of Cerebrospinal Fluid Reaches a New Horizon: Intimate Exchange between Cerebrospinal Fluid and Interstitial Fluid May Contribute to Maintenance of Homeostasis in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Mitsunori Matsumae; Osamu Sato; Akihiro Hirayama; Naokazu Hayashi; Ken Takizawa; Hideki Atsumi; Takatoshi Sorimachi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Starling forces drive intracranial water exchange during normal and pathological states.

Authors:  Andreas A Linninger; Colin Xu; Kevin Tangen; Grant Hartung
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Membrane transporters control cerebrospinal fluid formation independently of conventional osmosis to modulate intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Eva K Oernbo; Annette B Steffensen; Pooya Razzaghi Khamesi; Trine L Toft-Bertelsen; Dagne Barbuskaite; Frederik Vilhardt; Niklas J Gerkau; Katerina Tritsaris; Anja H Simonsen; Sara D Lolansen; Søren N Andreassen; Steen G Hasselbalch; Thomas Zeuthen; Christine R Rose; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Nanna MacAulay
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  No Arachnoid Granulations-No Problems: Number, Size, and Distribution of Arachnoid Granulations From Birth to 80 Years of Age.

Authors:  Milan Radoš; Matea Živko; Ante Periša; Darko Orešković; Marijan Klarica
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 8.  A proposed role for efflux transporters in the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Satish Krishnamurthy; Michael D Tichenor; Akhila G Satish; David B Lehmann
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 9.  Evaluation of the Production and Absorption of Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Masakazu Miyajima; Hajime Arai
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Biochemical profile of human infant cerebrospinal fluid in intraventricular hemorrhage and post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus of prematurity.

Authors:  Ayodamola Otun; Diego M Morales; Maria Garcia-Bonilla; Seth Goldberg; Leandro Castaneyra-Ruiz; Yan Yan; Albert M Isaacs; Jennifer M Strahle; James P McAllister; David D Limbrick
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-12-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.