Literature DB >> 20674336

Management and prevention of complications of subcutaneous intravenous infusion port.

Hsiang-Chun Jan1, Shao-Jiun Chou, Tzu-Hung Chen, Chuin-I Lee, Tze-Kai Chen, Mary Ann Lou.   

Abstract

Subcutaneous intravenous infusion port (SIIP) has become an increasingly and widely adopted technique in the management of oncology patients. This route has been used not only for chemotherapy but also for parenteral nutrition provision, blood transfusion, medication administration, blood sample collection, hemodialysis, and so on. This system provides a safe vascular access with low complication rate which helps preventing patients from vascular infection and catheter associated thrombosis. In this study, we reviewed 1247 cases of breast cancer patients that had subcutaneous intravenous infusion port implanted for chemotherapy in our general surgery department from 1990 to 2008. The result indicates that complication decreases as our technique and experience mature. We hereby share our accrued experience and improved technique, hoping to be of help to young surgeons.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674336     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  6 in total

1.  Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?

Authors:  Omer Fatih Nas; Kadir Hacikurt; Ahmet Kaya; Nurullah Dogan; Bekir Sanal; Guven Ozkaya; Halit Ziya Dundar; Cuneyt Erdogan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Morbidity of chemotherapy administration and satisfaction in breast cancer patients: a comparative study of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) versus peripheral venous access usage.

Authors:  Kul Ranjan Singh; Gaurav Agarwal; Gitika Nanda; Gyan Chand; Anjali Mishra; Amit Agarwal; Ashok K Verma; Saroj K Mishra; Puneet Goyal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of comfort and complications of Implantable Venous Access Port (IVAP) with ultrasound guided Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) and Axillary Vein/Subclavian Vein (AxV/SCV) puncture in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yan Bo Chen; Hao Shi Bao; Ting Ting Hu; Zhou He; Biaolin Wen; Feng Tao Liu; Feng Xi Su; He Ran Deng; Jian Nan Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.

Authors:  Se Jin Ahn; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Jin Wook Chung; Sang Bu An; Yong Hu Yin; Hwan Jun Jae; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Wei; Ching-Yang Wu; Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ta-Wei Su; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Po-Jen Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.