Literature DB >> 20674333

An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients.

Juan Ignacio Arraras1, Eva Greimel, Orhan Sezer, Wei-Chu Chie, Mia Bergenmar, Anna Costantini, Teresa Young, Karin Kuljanic Vlasic, Galina Velikova.   

Abstract

AIM: The EORTC Quality of Life (QOL) Group has developed an instrument to evaluate the information received by cancer patients. This study assessed the psychometric characteristics of the EORTC INFO module in a large international/multi-cultural sample of cancer patients.
METHODS: The provisional 26-item information module (EORTC INFO26) was administered with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the information scales of the inpatient satisfaction module EORTC IN-PATSAT32 on two occasions during the patients' treatment and follow-up period. Questionnaire-hypothesised scale structure, reliability, validity and responsiveness to changes were evaluated through standard psychometric analyses. Patient acceptability was assessed with a debriefing questionnaire.
RESULTS: The study comprised 509 patients from 8 countries (7 European countries and Taiwan) with different cancers and disease stages. Multi-trait scaling analysis led to the deletion of one item but confirmed the hypothesised 4 multi-item scales (information about disease, medical tests, treatment and other services) and eight single items. Internal consistency for all scales was good (α>0.70), as was test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations>0.70). All items can be combined to generate a single score (α>0.90). Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with related areas of IN-PATSAT32 (r>0.40). Low correlations with EORTC QLQ-C30 scales confirmed divergent validity (r<0.30) The EORTC INFO-25 module discriminated among groups based on gender, age, education, levels of anxiety and depression, information wishes and satisfaction. Only one scale captured changes over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC QLQ-INFO 25 is a reliable and valid self-reported instrument. The module can be used in cross-cultural observational and intervention studies.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674333     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  59 in total

1.  Patients' Perception of Information and Health-Related Quality of Life 1 Month After Discharge for Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Maria Lithner; Ulf Jakobsson; Edith Andersson; Rosemarie Klefsgård; Ingrid Palmquist; Jan Johansson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Information provision and patient reported outcomes in patients with metastasized colorectal cancer: results from the PROFILES registry.

Authors:  Olga Husson; Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Tineke J Smilde; Geert-Jan Creemers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Esophageal cancer patients' information management: cross-cultural differences between Dutch and Italian patients in perceived quality of provided oncological information.

Authors:  Luca M Saadeh; Annelijn E Slaman; Eleonora Pinto; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Francesco Cavallin; Egle Jezerskyte; Rita Alfieri; Loes Noteboom; Maria Cristina Bellissimo; Matteo Cagol; Giovanni Pirozzolo; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Influences of patient sociodemographics on cancer information received through the first 9 months of treatment.

Authors:  Anthony Molisani; Levent Dumenci; Robin K Matsuyama
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Construct validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire information module.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Philipp M Engelberg; Gregor Weißflog; Susanne Kuhnt; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Information needs and requirements in patients with brain tumours and their relatives.

Authors:  Christiane Reinert; Katharina Rathberger; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Oliver Kölbl; Martin Proescholdt; Markus J Riemenschneider; Gerhard Schuierer; Markus Hutterer; Michael Gerken; Peter Hau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ana Manterola; Berta Hernández; Fernando Arias de la Vega; Maite Martínez; Meritxell Vila; Clara Eito; Ruth Vera; Miguel Ángel Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Psychometric testing of the Mandarin version of the 34-item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey in patients with cancer in mainland China.

Authors:  Yuan Han; Ying Zhou; Jing Wang; Qian Zhao; Huiying Qin; Yuying Fan; Yalan Song; Allison Boyes; Shuzhong Cui
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Potential curability and perception of received information in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Eleonora Pinto; Francesco Cavallin; Luca Maria Saadeh; Maria Cristina Bellissimo; Rita Alfieri; Silvia Mantoan; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-INFO 25 questionnaire in Lebanese cancer patients: Is ignorance a Bliss?

Authors:  Samer Tabchi; Elie El Rassy; Aline Khazaka; Fadi El Karak; Hampig Raphael Kourie; Ralph Chebib; Tarek Assi; Maya Ghor; Lara Naamani; Sami Richa; Marwan Ghosn; Joseph Kattan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.