Literature DB >> 20673708

A review of the clinical evidence for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

J Staffurth1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy that offers improvements in dosimetry in many clinical scenarios. Here we review the clinical evidence for IMRT and present ongoing or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: We identified randomised and non-randomised comparative studies of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy using MEDLINE, hand-searching Radiotherapy and Oncology and the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics and the proceedings of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology annual meetings. The metaRegister of Controlled Trials was searched to identify completed-unpublished, ongoing and planned RCTs.
RESULTS: Sixty-one studies comparing IMRT and conventional radiotherapy were identified. These included three RCTs in head and neck cancer (205 patients) and three in breast cancer (664 patients) that had reported clinical outcomes; these were all powered for toxicity-related end points, which were significantly better with IMRT in each trial. There were 27 additional non-randomised studies in head and neck (1119 patients), 26 in prostate cancer (>5000 patients), four in breast cancer (875 patients) and nine in other tumour sites. The results of these studies supported those of the RCTs with benefits reported in acute and late toxicity, health-related quality of life and tumour control end points. Twenty-eight completed-unpublished, ongoing or planned RCTs incorporating IMRT were identified, including at least 12,310 patients, of which 15 compared conventional radiotherapy within IMRT as a randomisation or pre-planned stratification. DISCUSSION: Inverse-planned IMRT maintains parotid saliva production and reduces acute and late xerostomia during radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer, reduces late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients allowing safe dose escalation and seems to reduce toxicity in several other tumour sites. Forward-planned IMRT reduces acute toxicity and improves late clinician-assessed cosmesis compared with conventional tangential breast radiotherapy. Copyright 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673708     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  65 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  SBRT and extreme hypofractionation: A new era in prostate cancer treatments?

Authors:  Filippo Alongi; Alba Fiorentino; Berardino De Bari
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-10-22

Review 3.  Prevention of pelvic radiation disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Fuccio; Leonardo Frazzoni; Alessandra Guido
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  No increase in toxicity of pelvic irradiation when intensity modulation is employed: clinical and dosimetric data of 208 patients treated with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Delia Ciardo; Silvia Ferrario; Piero Fossati; Giuseppe Fanetti; Dario Zerini; Davide Zannoni; Cristiana Fodor; Marianna A Gerardi; Alessia Surgo; Matteo Muto; Raffaella Cambria; Ottavio De Cobelli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Li Yin; Hao Wu; Jian Gong; Jian-Hao Geng; Fan Jiang; An-Hui Shi; Rong Yu; Yong-Heng Li; Shu-Kui Han; Bo Xu; Guang-Ying Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Evaluation of the trade-offs encountered in planning and treating locally advanced head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs dual-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  M Oliver; D McConnell; M Romani; A McAllister; A Pearce; A Andronowski; X Wang; K Leszczynski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Promises and pitfalls of new technology in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ferran Guedea
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Does a too risk-averse approach to the implementation of new radiotherapy technologies delay their clinical use?

Authors:  R Garcia; H Nyström; C Fiorino; D Thwaites
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Unintended cardiac irradiation during left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  R B Goody; J O'Hare; K McKenna; L Dearey; J Robinson; P Bell; J Clarke; J J A McAleer; J M O'Sullivan; G G Hanna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The value of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in challenging clinical settings.

Authors:  S J Treece; M Mukesh; Y L Rimmer; S J Tudor; J C Dean; R J Benson; D L Gregory; G Horan; S J Jefferies; S G Russell; M V Williams; C B Wilson; N G Burnet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.