Literature DB >> 20672215

Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: sexual but more emotional than one-night stands.

Peter K Jonason1, Norman P Li, Jessica Richardson.   

Abstract

Most research on human sexuality has focused on long-term pairbonds and one-night stands. However, growing evidence suggests there are relationships that do not fit cleanly into either of those categories. One of these relationships is a "booty-call relationship." The purpose of this study was to describe the sexual and emotional nature of booty-call relationships by (a) examining the types of emotional and sexual acts involved in booty-call relationships and (b) comparing the frequency of those acts in booty-call relationships to one-night stands and serious long-term relationships. In addition, the manner in which sociosexuality is associated with the commission of these acts was also examined. Demonstrative of booty-call relationships' sexual nature was individuals' tendency to leave after sex and infrequent handholding. In contrast, the romantic nature of booty-call relationships was demonstrated through the frequency of acts like kissing. The results suggest the booty-call relationship is a distinct type of relationship situated between one-night stands and serious romantic relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20672215     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2010.497984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  11 in total

1.  Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; Chris Reiber; Sean G Massey; Ann M Merriwether
Journal:  Rev Gen Psychol       Date:  2012-06-01

2.  Evaluations and Future Plans After Casual Sexual Experiences: Differences Across Partner Type.

Authors:  Rose Wesche; Shannon E Claxton; Eva S Lefkowitz; Manfred H M van Dulmen
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 3.  Dyadic Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships: The Dyadic Interactions Affecting Dyadic Sexual Desire Model.

Authors:  Sofia Prekatsounaki; Luk Gijs; Paul Enzlin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-15

4.  Are the Developmental Features of Emerging Adulthood Associated with Willingness to Engage in Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships?

Authors:  Spencer B Olmstead; Kristin M Anders
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships.

Authors:  Lisa J van Raalte; Lori A Bednarchik; Mark A Generous; Paul A Mongeau
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  How black heterosexual men's narratives about sexual partner type and condom use disrupt the main and casual partner dichotomy: 'we still get down, but we not together'.

Authors:  Lisa Bowleg; Jenné S Massie; Sidney L Holt; Andrea Heckert; Michelle Teti; Jeanne M Tschann
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2020-02-10

7.  Casual Sexual Scripts on the Screen: A Quantitative Content Analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Timmermans; Jan Van den Bulck
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-03-27

8.  Clear-Cut Terms and Culture-Sensitive Characteristics of Distinctive Casual Sexual Relationships in Portuguese Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Maria-João Alvarez; Cícero R Pereira; Cristina A Godinho; Rita Luz
Journal:  Sex Cult       Date:  2021-04-10

9.  Posttraumatic stress and risky sex in trauma-exposed college students: the role of personality dispositions toward impulsive behavior.

Authors:  Jessica Flores; C Alex Brake; Caitlyn O Hood; Christal L Badour
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2020-10-13

10.  Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Jaymie Park; Shannon Leung; Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.