Literature DB >> 20671646

Catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A review.

R Broholm1, L Panduro Jensen, N Baekgaard.   

Abstract

Patients with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis treated with anticoagulation only are at high risk of developing postthrombotic syndrome. Immediate removal of the thrombus by catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) may increase patency, prevent damage of the venous valves, and prevent reflux and PTS. However, the indications for its use are not well established because of lack of data from randomised controlled trials. Aim of this review was to describe the treatment of iliofemoral venous thrombosis with CDT and to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapy. An electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on the largest studies (more than 40 legs treated) concerning catheter-directed thrombolysis of iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A total of 236 publications were identified but only 11 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 979 lower limbs. Early patency from 6-12 months was 60-95% and patency after six years was 82%, reported in one study. Mortality of up to 1% was reported in two studies. Major complications such as hematomas requiring surgery were observed in 1-11% whereas minor complications, mostly bleeding from the puncture site, were seen in up to 18%. CDT seems to be effective in the treatment of iliofemoral venous thrombosis and results are promising. Studies are, however, characterized by heterogeneity and are difficult to compare. Only one study reports long-term follow-up and incidence of postthrombotic syndrome is not reported. Further studies regarding the use of CDT, both alone and in combination with mechanical thrombectomy are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Angiol        ISSN: 0392-9590            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of venous obstructions in (recurrent) venous thromboembolism: a case-control study.

Authors:  Pascale Notten; Rob H W Strijkers; Irwin Toonder; Hugo Ten Cate; Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  A novel hollow and perforated flexible wire allows the safe and effective local application of thrombolytic therapy in a mouse model of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Thilo Witsch; Maximilian Mauler; Nadine Herr; Daniela Stallmann; Christoph Bode; Christoph Hehrlein; Daniel Duerschmied
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Results of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute ilio-femoral deep venous thrombosis - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christina P Madsen; Jerzy Gesla; Radu L Vijdea; Maria A Serifi; Johnny K Christensen; Kim Houlind
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-29

4.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel; Ignacio Neumann; Walter Ageno; Rebecca Beyth; Nathan P Clark; Adam Cuker; Barbara A Hutten; Michael R Jaff; Veena Manja; Sam Schulman; Caitlin Thurston; Suresh Vedantham; Peter Verhamme; Daniel M Witt; Ivan D Florez; Ariel Izcovich; Robby Nieuwlaat; Stephanie Ross; Holger J Schünemann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Yuan Zhang; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Effects of thrombolysis on outcomes of patients with deep venous thrombosis: An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenhua Xing; Liang Tang; Zhaowei Zhu; Xinqun Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of the Result of Continued Thrombolysis After Stenting Following Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ya-Dong Zhou; Ying-Ying Chen; Ming Xue; Xue-Xun Zheng; Xing-Sheng Chen; Yun-Biao Guan
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.