PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with students' comfort in addressing patients' sexuality in the clinical context. METHOD: The authors invited students enrolled in MD-degree-granting and osteopathic medical schools in the United States and Canada to participate in an anonymous Internet survey between February and July 2008. The survey assessed ethnodemographic factors and sexual history. Respondents also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Male respondents completed the International Index of Erectile Function and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Female respondents completed the Female Sexual Function Index and the Index of Sex Life. The authors used descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and multivariable logistic regression to analyze responses. RESULTS: The authors' analyses included 2,261 completed survey responses: 910 from men, 1,343 from women, and 8 from individuals who self-identified as "other" gendered. Over 53% of respondents (n = 1,206) stated that they felt they had not received sufficient training in medical school to address sexual concerns clinically. Despite this, 81% of students (n = 1,827) reported feeling comfortable dealing with their patients' sexuality issues. Students with limited sexual experience, students at risk for sexual problems, and students who felt that they had not been trained adequately were less likely to report being comfortable talking to patients about sexual health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Perception of inadequate sexuality training in medical school and personal issues pertaining to sex may be associated with students' difficulty in addressing patients' sexuality. Adequate training is preeminently associated with feeling comfortable addressing patients' sexuality and should be a priority for medical education.
PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with students' comfort in addressing patients' sexuality in the clinical context. METHOD: The authors invited students enrolled in MD-degree-granting and osteopathic medical schools in the United States and Canada to participate in an anonymous Internet survey between February and July 2008. The survey assessed ethnodemographic factors and sexual history. Respondents also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Male respondents completed the International Index of Erectile Function and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Female respondents completed the Female Sexual Function Index and the Index of Sex Life. The authors used descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and multivariable logistic regression to analyze responses. RESULTS: The authors' analyses included 2,261 completed survey responses: 910 from men, 1,343 from women, and 8 from individuals who self-identified as "other" gendered. Over 53% of respondents (n = 1,206) stated that they felt they had not received sufficient training in medical school to address sexual concerns clinically. Despite this, 81% of students (n = 1,827) reported feeling comfortable dealing with their patients' sexuality issues. Students with limited sexual experience, students at risk for sexual problems, and students who felt that they had not been trained adequately were less likely to report being comfortable talking to patients about sexual health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Perception of inadequate sexuality training in medical school and personal issues pertaining to sex may be associated with students' difficulty in addressing patients' sexuality. Adequate training is preeminently associated with feeling comfortable addressing patients' sexuality and should be a priority for medical education.
Authors: Katherine Coyne; Sundhiya Mandalia; Sonya McCullough; Jose Catalan; Christiana Noestlinger; Robert Colebunders; David Asboe Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: D S Solursh; J L Ernst; R W Lewis; L Michael Prisant; T M Mills; L P Solursh; R G Jarvis; W H Salazar Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Daniel R Walen; Emma A Nye; Sean M Rogers; Ashley K Crossway; Zachary K Winkelmann; Stacy E Walker; Lindsey E Eberman Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: David Córdova; Frania Mendoza Lua; Lauretta Ovadje; Kathryn Fessler; José A Bauermeister; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn; Youth Leadership Council Journal: Health Commun Date: 2017-07-07
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Rita S Lee; Ingrid A Binswanger; Misoo C Ellison; Eva M Aagaard Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; J Dennis Fortenberry; Kathryn I Pollak; Terrill Bravender; J Kelly Davis; Truls Ostbye; James A Tulsky; Rowena J Dolor; Cleveland G Shields Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 16.193