Literature DB >> 20671073

System-wide learning from root cause analysis: a report from the New South Wales Root Cause Analysis Review Committee.

Jonny Taitz1, Kelvin Genn, Vanessa Brooks, Deborah Ross, Kathleen Ryan, Bronwyn Shumack, Tony Burrell, Peter Kennedy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preventable errors are common in healthcare. Over the last decade, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) has become a key tool for healthcare services to investigate adverse events and try to prevent them from happening again. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the work of the New South Wales (NSW) RCA Review Committee. The benefits of correctly classifying, aggregating and disseminating RCA data to clinicians will be discussed. In NSW, we perform an average of 500 RCAs per year. It is estimated that each RCA takes between 20 and 90 h to perform. In 2007, the NSW Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC) and the Quality and Safety Branch at the Department of Health constituted an RCA review committee. 445 RCAs were reviewed by the committee in 14 months. 41 RCAs were related to errors in managing acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The large number of RCAs has enabled the committee to identify emerging themes and to aggregate the information about underlying human (staff), patient and system factors. The committee has developed a taxonomy based on previous work done within health and aviation and assesses each RCA against this set of criteria. The effectiveness of recommendations made by RCA teams requires further review. There has been conjecture that staff do not feel empowered to articulate root causes which are beyond the capacity of the local service to address.
CONCLUSION: Given the number of hours per RCA, it seems a shame that the final output of the process may not in fact achieve the desired patient safety improvements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671073     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.032144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  8 in total

1.  Paediatric critical incident analysis: lessons learnt on analysis, recommendations and implementation.

Authors:  Cynthia van der Starre; Monique van Dijk; Ada van den Bos; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Jane Carthey; Carl Macrae; Rene Amalberti
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 3.  Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals.

Authors:  Yick Ting A Kwok; Alastair Py Mah; Katherine Mc Pang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Training health care professionals in root cause analysis: a cross-sectional study of post-training experiences, benefits and attitudes.

Authors:  Paul Bowie; Joe Skinner; Carl de Wet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The problem with root cause analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Farhad Peerally; Susan Carr; Justin Waring; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Improving Apparent Cause Analysis Reliability: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Kristen M Crandall; May-Britt Sten; Ahmed Almuhanna; Lisbeth Fahey; Rahul K Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2017-05-25

7.  Deficiencies in healthcare prior to suicide and actions to deal with them: a retrospective study of investigations after suicide in Swedish healthcare.

Authors:  Elin Roos Af Hjelmsäter; Axel Ros; Boel Andersson Gäre; Åsa Westrin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective.

Authors:  Mees Casper Baartmans; Steffie Marijke Van Schoten; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.