Literature DB >> 20671046

Elevated D-dimers are also a marker of underlying malignancy and increased mortality in the absence of venous thromboembolism.

L Knowlson1, S Bacchu, S Paneesha, A McManus, K Randall, P Rose.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D-dimers are used in conjunction with clinical probability scores in the assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and they are elevated in other conditions, including malignancy, infection and arrhythmias. High levels of D-dimers in VTE are associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality. Their significance in patients without VTE has not previously been established. AIMS: To establish the clinical significance of elevated D-dimer levels in patients without VTE.
METHODS: This prospective study included 2263 patient episodes of suspected deep vein thrombosis, which were excluded radiologically. Patients were followed up for survival and adverse events for a median of 22 months.
RESULTS: D-dimer levels greater than 4000 ng FEU/ml (4.9% of patients), and greater than 8000 ng FEU/ml (1.8%) were associated with a reduced overall survival. D-dimer levels greater than 8000 ng FEU/ml and age over 60 years were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (p<0.001.). D-dimer levels greater than 8000 ng FEU/ml were associated with an increased incidence of malignancy (p=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of very high D-dimer levels in patients with cancer who do not have VTE. This suggests that elevated D-dimer levels in patients with VTE and malignancy are not solely due to presence of thrombus. High D-dimer levels in malignancy are likely to reflect the biology of the underlying tumour, with higher levels observed in breast, prostate and bowel cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671046     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2010.076349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  20 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Thromboembolic disease in cancer patients.

Authors:  Nadia Hindi; Nazaret Cordero; Enrique Espinosa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Prognostic value of preoperative D-dimer and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients undergoing intended curative resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ehsan Motavaf; Kåre Gotschalck Sunesen; Mogens Tornby Stender; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Update from the clinic: what's new in the diagnosis of cancer-associated thrombosis?

Authors:  Erica A Peterson; Agnes Y Y Lee
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 5.  Biomolecular markers of cancer-associated thromboembolism.

Authors:  Diana L Hanna; Richard H White; Ted Wun
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Arterial and venous thrombosis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrew D Blann; Simon Dunmore
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Impact of breast cancer stage, time from diagnosis and chemotherapy on plasma and cellular biomarkers of hypercoagulability.

Authors:  Mourad Chaari; Ines Ayadi; Aurelie Rousseau; Eleftheria Lefkou; Patrick Van Dreden; Fatoumata Sidibe; Hela Ketatni; Vassiliki Galea; Amir Khaterchi; Racem Bouzguenda; Mounir Frikha; Lilia Ghorbal; Jamel Daoud; Choumous Kallel; Martin Quinn; Joseph Gligorov; Jean Pierre Lotz; Mohamed Hatmi; Ismail Elalamy; Grigoris T Gerotziafas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Predictive value of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuezhen Wang; Zhun Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  D-Dimer elevation and adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Rim Halaby; Christopher J Popma; Ander Cohen; Gerald Chi; Marcelo Rodrigues Zacarkim; Gonzalo Romero; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Russell Hull; Adrian Hernandez; Robert Mentz; Robert Harrington; Gregory Lip; Frank Peacock; James Welker; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Yazan Daaboul; Serge Korjian; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  The clinical significance of ultra-high D-dimer levels.

Authors:  Kristin Schafer; Eric Goldschmidt; Drew Oostra; John Fish; Todd Russell; Fedor Lurie
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.