OBJECTIVES: MMF is cleaved in the acidic milieu of the gastric compartment. However, its absorption might be impeded by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which suppress acid production and thus increase stomach pH. Since PPIs are widely used, it is useful to clarify whether the total drug amount of MMF is available in patients undergoing PPI treatment. METHODS: We analysed 36 patients with autoimmune diseases under stable MMF maintenance therapy. Twenty-three patients received co-medication with pantoprazole; 13 patients received no treatment with PPIs or antacids. To assess the immunosuppressive potency, we measured mycophenolic acid levels and inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity with a validated HPLC method in plasma samples collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after oral administration. RESULTS: The mean MMF dosage of the non-PPI patients was 770 (249) mg/12 h and 771 (291) mg/12 h in pantoprazole-treated patients (NS). The total area under the curve of MMF showed a 37% reduction in PPI patients vs those treated with no PPIs (P < 0.01), and the maximum peak concentration of MMF was 60% lower in the pantoprazole patients (P < 0.001). The MMF exposure correlated with the inhibition of IMPDH activity. The area of enzyme activity curve was 42% higher in the PPI patients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The co-medication of pantoprazole with MMF significantly influences the drug exposure and immunosuppressive potency of MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases. This finding might at least partly explain the different outcomes in studies using MMF for maintenance therapy.
OBJECTIVES: MMF is cleaved in the acidic milieu of the gastric compartment. However, its absorption might be impeded by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which suppress acid production and thus increase stomach pH. Since PPIs are widely used, it is useful to clarify whether the total drug amount of MMF is available in patients undergoing PPI treatment. METHODS: We analysed 36 patients with autoimmune diseases under stable MMF maintenance therapy. Twenty-three patients received co-medication with pantoprazole; 13 patients received no treatment with PPIs or antacids. To assess the immunosuppressive potency, we measured mycophenolic acid levels and inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity with a validated HPLC method in plasma samples collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after oral administration. RESULTS: The mean MMF dosage of the non-PPI patients was 770 (249) mg/12 h and 771 (291) mg/12 h in pantoprazole-treated patients (NS). The total area under the curve of MMF showed a 37% reduction in PPI patients vs those treated with no PPIs (P < 0.01), and the maximum peak concentration of MMF was 60% lower in the pantoprazolepatients (P < 0.001). The MMF exposure correlated with the inhibition of IMPDH activity. The area of enzyme activity curve was 42% higher in the PPI patients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The co-medication of pantoprazole with MMF significantly influences the drug exposure and immunosuppressive potency of MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases. This finding might at least partly explain the different outcomes in studies using MMF for maintenance therapy.
Authors: Lesley Ann Saketkoo; Tracy Frech; Cecília Varjú; Robyn Domsic; Jessica Farrell; Jessica K Gordon; Carina Mihai; Nora Sandorfi; Lee Shapiro; Janet Poole; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Monika Lammi; Kendra McAnally; Helene Alexanderson; Henrik Pettersson; Faye Hant; Masataka Kuwana; Ami A Shah; Vanessa Smith; Vivien Hsu; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Shervin Assassi; Maurizio Cutolo; Cristiane Kayser; Victoria K Shanmugam; Madelon C Vonk; Kim Fligelstone; Nancy Baldwin; Kerri Connolly; Anneliese Ronnow; Beata Toth; Maureen Suave; Sue Farrington; Elana J Bernstein; Leslie J Crofford; László Czirják; Kelly Jensen; Monique Hinchclif; Marie Hudson; Matthew R Lammi; Jennifer Mansour; Nadia D Morgan; Fabian Mendoza; Mandana Nikpour; John Pauling; Gabriela Riemekasten; Anne-Marie Russell; Mary Beth Scholand; Elise Seigart; Tatiana Sofia Rodriguez-Reyna; Laura Hummers; Ulrich Walker; Virginia Steen Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 4.991
Authors: David A Johnson; Philip O Katz; David Armstrong; Henry Cohen; Brendan C Delaney; Colin W Howden; Peter Katelaris; Radu I Tutuian; Donald O Castell Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Alenka Jaklič; Carol J Collins; Aleš Mrhar; Mohamed L Sorror; Brenda M Sandmaier; Meagan J Bemer; Igor Locatelli; Jeannine S McCune Journal: Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 1.366
Authors: Dominik J G Flothow; Barbara Suwelack; Hermann Pavenstädt; Katharina Schütte-Nütgen; Stefan Reuter Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 4.241