Literature DB >> 20671001

The need to improve the interface between in-hours and out-of-hours GP care, and between out-of-hours care and self-care.

Paul Kinnersley1, Jennifer N Egbunike, Mark Kelly, Kerry Hood, Eleri Owen-Jones, Lori A Button, Chris Shaw, Alison Porter, Helen Snooks, Sue Bowden, Adrian Edwards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: considerable changes have occurred over the last 5 years in the organization of out-of-hours care in the UK. Users' experiences of their care are an important part of 'quality of care' and are valuable for identifying areas for improvement. AIM: to identify strengths and weaknesses of out-of hours service provision in Wales. The design of the study is a cross-sectional survey. The setting of the study is nine GP services, three Accident and Emergency units and NHS Direct in Wales.
METHOD: survey using the validated Out-of-Hours questionnaire. We identified the four most and least favourably rated items regarding users' experience of care. These were analysed by type of care provided, telephone advice, treatment centre and home visit groups.
RESULTS: eight hundred and fifty-five of 3250 users responded (26% response rate). Across providers and types of care, consistent strengths were the 'manner of treatment by call operator' and the 'explanation of the next step by call operator'. Consistent weaknesses were the 'speed of call back by the clinician', the 'information provided by the GP', 'getting medication after the consultation' and 'when to contact the (in-hours) GP'.
CONCLUSIONS: users of out-of-hours care identify clear and consistent strengths and weaknesses of service provision across Wales. Specific areas for improvement concern the interface between in-hours care and out-of-hours care and between out-of-hours care and self-care. GP surgeries need to give better information on how to access the out-of-hours services. Out-of-hours providers should improve their advice on how and when to access in-hours surgeries and also improve the availability of medicines after out-of-hours consultations.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671001     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmq056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  How do patients respond when confronted with telephone access barriers to care?

Authors:  Sara M Locatelli; Sherri L LaVela; Mary E Talbot; Michael L Davies
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Exploring patients' self-reported experiences of out-of-hours primary care and their suggestions for improvement: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ria Poole; Arla Gamper; Alison Porter; Jennifer Egbunike; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Patients' experience of outsourcing and care related to magnetic resonance examinations.

Authors:  Parvin Tavakol Olofsson; Peter Aspelin; Lott Bergstrand; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.384

4.  Establishing the validity of English GP Patient Survey items evaluating out-of-hours care.

Authors:  Luke T A Mounce; Heather E Barry; Raffaele Calitri; William E Henley; John Campbell; Martin Roland; Suzanne Richards
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Does risk and urgency of requested out-of-hours general practitioners care differ for people with intellectual disabilities in residential settings compared with the general population in the Netherlands? A cross-sectional routine data-based study.

Authors:  Marloes Heutmekers; Jenneken Naaldenberg; Sabine A Verheggen; Willem J J Assendelft; Henny M J van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk; Hilde Tobi; Geraline L Leusink
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.