Literature DB >> 20670231

Increased risk of orofacial clefts associated with maternal obesity: case-control study and Monte Carlo-based bias analysis.

Marni Stott-Miller1, Carrie L Heike, Mario Kratz, Jacqueline R Starr.   

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate whether infants born to obese or diabetic women are at higher risk of non-syndromic orofacial clefting. We conducted a population-based case-control study using Washington State birth certificate and hospitalisation data for the years 1987-2005. Cases were infants born with orofacial clefts (n = 2153) and controls infants without orofacial clefts (n = 18 070). The primary exposures were maternal obesity (body mass index > or =30) and diabetes (either pre-existing or gestational). We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to compare, for mothers of cases and controls, the proportions of obese vs. normal-weight women and diabetic vs. non-diabetic women. We additionally performed Monte Carlo-based simulation analysis to explore possible influences of biases. Obese women had a small increased risk of isolated orofacial clefts in their offspring compared with normal-body mass index women [adjusted OR 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.55]. Results were similar regardless of type of cleft. Bias analyses suggest that estimates may represent underlying ORs of stronger magnitude. Results for diabetic women were highly imprecise and inconsistent. We and others have observed weak associations of similar magnitude between maternal obesity and risk of non-syndromic orofacial clefts. These results could be due to bias or residual confounding. However, it is also possible that these results represent a stronger underlying association. More precise exposure measurement could help distinguish between these two possibilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20670231      PMCID: PMC2965650          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01142.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  45 in total

1.  Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects--United States, 1999-2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Prepregnancy obesity as a risk factor for structural birth defects.

Authors:  D Kim Waller; Gary M Shaw; Sonja A Rasmussen; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mark A Canfield; Anna-Maria Siega-Riz; M Shayne Gallaway; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2007-08

3.  The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Victoria L Holt; Vicky Cárdenas; Jennifer C Nelson; Thomas R Easterling; Carolyn Gardella; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Accounting for independent nondifferential misclassification does not increase certainty that an observed association is in the correct direction.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  The human placenta in gestational diabetes mellitus. The insulin and cytokine network.

Authors:  Gernot Desoye; Sylvie Hauguel-de Mouzon
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  The perfect storm: obesity, adipocyte dysfunction, and metabolic consequences.

Authors:  Sarah de Ferranti; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Hypoxic stress in diabetic pregnancy contributes to impaired embryo gene expression and defective development by inducing oxidative stress.

Authors:  Rulin Li; Martha Chase; Sung-Kwon Jung; Peter J S Smith; Mary R Loeken
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 8.  A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Connor Gorber; M Tremblay; D Moher; B Gorber
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.213

9.  Neonatal nucleated red blood cells in infants of overweight and obese mothers.

Authors:  Galit Sheffer-Mimouni; Francis B Mimouni; Shaul Dollberg; Dror Mandel; Varda Deutsch; Yoav Littner
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Mild gestational hyperglycaemia as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Carlos Antonio Negrato; Lois Jovanovic; Marcos Antonio Tambascia; Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon; Bruno Geloneze; Adriano Dias; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

View more
  9 in total

1.  Potential sensitivity of bias analysis results to incorrect assumptions of nondifferential or differential binary exposure misclassification.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; W Dana Flanders; Matthew J Strickland; Margaret A Honein; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  A population-based case-control study of the association between weather-related extreme heat events and orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Aida Soim; Scott C Sheridan; Syni-An Hwang; Wan-Hsiang Hsu; Sarah C Fisher; Gary M Shaw; Marcia L Feldkamp; Paul A Romitti; Jennita Reefhuis; Peter H Langlois; Marilyn L Browne; Shao Lin
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Multiple bias analysis using logistic regression: an example from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Penelope P Howards; Matthew J Strickland; D Kim Waller; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLEFT LIP / PALATE IN NEWBORNS.

Authors:  A Kozma; V Radoi; R Ursu; C L Bohaltea; H Lazarescu; S Carniciu
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.877

Review 5.  What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omoroghogho Maria Izedonmwen; Claudia Cunningham; Tatiana V Macfarlane
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2015-03-30

6.  Parental risk factors for oral clefts among Central Africans, Southeast Asians, and Central Americans.

Authors:  Jane C Figueiredo; Stephanie Ly; Kathleen S Magee; Ugonna Ihenacho; James W Baurley; Pedro A Sanchez-Lara; Frederick Brindopke; Thi-Hai-Duc Nguyen; Viet Nguyen; Maria Irene Tangco; Melissa Giron; Tamlin Abrahams; Grace Jang; Annie Vu; Emily Zolfaghari; Caroline A Yao; Athena Foong; Yves A DeClerk; Jonathan M Samet; William Magee
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-08-25

7.  Influence of Parental Exposure to Risk Factors in the Occurrence of Oral Clefts.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Altoé; Álvaro Henrique Borges; Ana Thereza de Saboia Campos Neves; Andreza Maria Fábio Aranha; Alexandre Meireles Borba; Mariano Martinez Espinosa; Luiz Evaristo Ricci Volpato
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2020-06

8.  Targeted Re-Sequencing of the 2p21 Locus Identifies Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip Only Novel Susceptibility Gene ZFP36L2.

Authors:  Mu-Jia Li; Jia-Yu Shi; Qiu-Shuang Zhu; Bing Shi; Zhong-Lin Jia
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Epidemiology, Etiology, and Treatment of Isolated Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Madeleine L Burg; Yang Chai; Caroline A Yao; William Magee; Jane C Figueiredo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.