Literature DB >> 20669190

A chemical strategy for the relaxivity enhancement of Gd(III) chelates anchored on mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Fabio Carniato1, Lorenzo Tei, Maurizio Cossi, Leonardo Marchese, Mauro Botta.   

Abstract

Functionalised MCM-41 mesoporous silica nanoparticles were used as carriers of Gd(III) complexes for the development of nanosized magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Three Gd(III) complexes based on the 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane scaffold (DOTA; monoamide-, DOTA- and DO3A-like complexes) with distinct structural and magnetic properties were anchored on the silica nanoparticles functionalised with NH(2) groups. The interaction between Gd(III) chelates and surface functional groups markedly influenced the relaxometric properties of the hybrid materials, and were deeply modified passing from ionic -NH(3)(+) to neutral amides. A complete study of the structural, textural and surface properties together with a full (1)H relaxometric characterisation of these hybrid materials before and after surface modification was carried out. Particularly for the anionic complex 2 attached to MCM-41, an impressive increase in relaxivity (r(1p)) was observed (from 20.3 to 37.8 mM(-1) s(-1), 86.2% enhancement at 20 MHz and 310 K), mainly due to a threefold faster water exchange rate after acetylation of the surface -NH(3)(+) ions. This high r(1p) value, coupled with the large molar amount of grafted 2 onto the silica nanoparticles gives rise to a value of relaxivity per particle of 29,500 mM(-1) s(-1), which possibly allows it to be used in molecular imaging procedures. Smaller changes were observed for the hybrid materials based on neutral 1 and 3 complexes. In fact, whereas 1 shows a weak interaction with the surface and acetylation induced only some decrease of the local rotation, complex 3 appears to be involved in a strong interaction with surface silanols. This results in the displacement of a coordinated water molecule and in a decrease of the accessibility of the solvent to the metal centre, which is unaffected by the modification of ammonium ions to neutral amides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20669190     DOI: 10.1002/chem.201000499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.236


  10 in total

Review 1.  Development of mesoporous silica nanomaterials as a vehicle for anticancer drug delivery.

Authors:  Rolando E Yanes; Fuyuhiko Tamanoi
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Personalized nanomedicine advancements for stem cell tracking.

Authors:  Miroslaw Janowski; Jeff W M Bulte; Piotr Walczak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Engineering Gd-loaded nanoparticles to enhance MRI sensitivity via T(1) shortening.

Authors:  Michael A Bruckman; Xin Yu; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Location-tuned relaxivity in Gd-doped mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jason J Davis; Wen-Yen Huang; Gemma-Louise Davies
Journal:  J Mater Chem       Date:  2012-10-16

5.  Silica microparticles as a solid support for gadolinium phosphonate magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexandra K Duncan; Piper J Klemm; Kenneth N Raymond; Christopher C Landry
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Polydopamine-decorated tobacco mosaic virus for photoacoustic/magnetic resonance bimodal imaging and photothermal cancer therapy.

Authors:  He Hu; Qi Yang; Simona Baroni; Hong Yang; Silvio Aime; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 7.  Environmentally responsive MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Gemma-Louise Davies; Iris Kramberger; Jason J Davis
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Silica-coated Gd(DOTA)-loaded protein nanoparticles enable magnetic resonance imaging of macrophages.

Authors:  Michael A Bruckman; Lauren N Randolph; Neetu M Gulati; Phoebe L Stewart; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 9.  Inorganic-organic hybrid nanomaterials for therapeutic and diagnostic imaging applications.

Authors:  Juan L Vivero-Escoto; Yu-Tzu Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Non-metallic nanomaterials in cancer theranostics: a review of silica- and carbon-based drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Chen; Xin-Chun Huang; Yun-Ling Luo; Yung-Chen Chang; You-Zung Hsieh; Hsin-Yun Hsu
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 8.090

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.