Literature DB >> 2066762

Carboplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide: a randomized trial in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

P F Conte1, M Bruzzone, F Carnino, S Chiara, M Donadio, V Facchini, P Fioretti, G Foglia, A Gadducci, L Gallo.   

Abstract

One hundred sixty-four patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were randomized to receive cisplatin (CDDP) 50 mg/mq, doxorubicin 45 mg/mq, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/mq (PAC) or carboplatin 200 mg/mq, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/mq (CAC). To administer equitoxic doses at each cycle, the drug dosages were adjusted according to the hematologic toxicities experienced after the previous course; 44.7% of CAC and 21.1% of PAC patients required a dosage reduction at the second course (P = .002). Neither CAC nor PAC caused any clinically relevant neuro-nephrotoxicity; however, CDDP was administered with hydration and forced diuresis, while carboplatin was administered by rapid intravenous (IV) infusion. After six cycles, response rates were superimposable: 62.5% and 66.6% for CAC and PAC, respectively; pathologic complete responses (pCRs) were 16.7% for CAC and 23.2% for PAC; among patients with more than 2 cm residual disease, PAC induced more pCRs than CAC (eight of 52 or 15.4% v one of 42 or 2.4%, P = .07). Median survivals and progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 22.6 and 13.2 months for PAC, and 23.1 and 15.5 months for CAC, respectively; these differences are not significant. In conclusion, this trial demonstrates that equitoxic doses of PAC or CAC result in a similar response rate, PFS, and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066762     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.4.658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Carboplatin and cisplatin: are they equivalent in efficacy in "optimal residual" advanced ovarian cancer?

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Bryant; Shaun Hiu; Patience T Kunonga; Ketankumar Gajjar; Dawn Craig; Luke Vale; Brett A Winter-Roach; Ahmed Elattar; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

Review 3.  New platinum agents. A comparison in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L R Kelland; M J McKeage
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Treatment strategy for recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer: efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Toshinari Muramatsu; Takao Shinozuka; Takeshi Hirasawa; Hitomi Tsukada; Hironobu Maeda; Tsuyoshi Miyamoto; Masaru Murakami; Hiroshi Kajiwara; Masanori Yasuda; R Yoshiyuki Osamura; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  Acta Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists' Group.

Authors:  K Aabo; M Adams; P Adnitt; D S Alberts; A Athanazziou; V Barley; D R Bell; U Bianchi; G Bolis; M F Brady; H S Brodovsky; H Bruckner; M Buyse; R Canetta; V Chylak; C J Cohen; N Colombo; P F Conte; D Crowther; J H Edmonson; C Gennatas; E Gilbey; M Gore; D Guthrie; B Y Yeap
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Potentiation of cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) by amphotericin B in BALB/c nude mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma cells.

Authors:  M Kojima; F Kikkawa; H Oguchi; K Tamakoshi; O Maeda; N Suganuma; Y Tomoda
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1994-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.