Literature DB >> 2066761

A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as salvage treatment for minimal residual ovarian carcinoma.

S Kirmani1, W E Lucas, S Kim, R Goel, L McVey, J Morris, S B Howell.   

Abstract

We conducted a phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16) as salvage therapy in patients with ovarian cancer who had persistent disease or who had relapsed after primary systemic chemotherapy and had residual disease of less than 2 cm. Two hundred eleven courses of IP chemotherapy consisting of CDDP 200 mg/m2 and VP-16 350 mg/m2 were administered. All patients received intravenous (IV) thiosulfate protection. Treatment was given once every 4 weeks for a median of six cycles. Twenty-four of 37 assessable patients were clinically free of disease at the end of treatment (normal physical exam, computed tomographic [CT] scan, CA-125 and peritoneal cytology); one patient had a partial response. Ten of these 24 patients consented to reexploration at the end of treatment, and nine were in pathologic complete remission, while one patient had positive peritoneal washings as her only evidence of persistent disease. The median survival of the 37 patients was 26 months from the first day of IP treatment and 51 months from diagnosis. The major toxicity was myelosuppression, with median nadir WBC, granulocyte, and platelet counts of 2,400, 684, and 134,000/mm3, respectively. There was no cumulative renal damage, hypomagnesemia, or chemical peritonitis. We conclude that IP CDDP and VP-16 can produce pathologic complete remissions when used as a second-line regimen for patients with ovarian cancer who have received systemic cisplatin-based therapy and have less than 2 cm disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066761     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.4.649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management.

Authors:  Jacob Atsmon; Eran Dolev
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer, with special reference to delayed peritoneal complications.

Authors:  W Adachi; S Koike; M Rafique; S Kajikawa; G Kaneko; T Kuroda; F Iida; K Ishii
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Phase 2 trial of chronic low-dose oral etoposide as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Markman; T Hakes; B Reichman; J Curtin; R Barakat; S Rubin; W Jones; J L Lewis; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Devansu Tewari; James J Java; Ritu Salani; Deborah K Armstrong; Maurie Markman; Thomas Herzog; Bradley J Monk; John K Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.