Literature DB >> 2066747

The evaluation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: design.

E H Wagner1, T D Koepsell, C Anderman, A Cheadle, S G Curry, B M Psaty, M Von Korff, T M Wickizer, W L Beery, P K Diehr.   

Abstract

The Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program (CHPGP) provides funding and technical assistance in support of community-based efforts to prevent major health problems. The first phase of the program was implemented in 11 communities in the western United States. This paper describes the evaluation design of the CHPGP in the West, the methods of data collection, and the baseline comparability of intervention and control communities. Major features of the evaluation design include: (1) the randomization of qualified communities making application into funded and unfunded comparison groups; (2) a second set of matched control communities for some intervention sites; (3) data gathering through repeated surveys of community residents (probability samples of adults and adolescents) and institutions (health-related organizations and randomly sampled grocery stores and restaurants); and (4) the use of secondary data to monitor health events. Selected baseline data show that intervention and control communities differ in racial/ethnic composition, but relevant health behaviors and ratings of community activation for health promotion appear comparable.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066747     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90029-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.

Authors:  Cheryl Merzel; Joanna D'Afflitti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Testing communities that care: the rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the community youth development study.

Authors:  J David Hawkins; Richard F Catalano; Michael W Arthur; Elizabeth Egan; Eric C Brown; Robert D Abbott; David M Murray
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2008-05-31

3.  Activating communities for health promotion: a process evaluation method.

Authors:  T M Wickizer; M Von Korff; A Cheadle; J Maeser; E H Wagner; D Pearson; W Beery; B M Psaty
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Relationship between socioeconomic status, health status, and lifestyle practices of American Indians: evidence from a Plains reservation population.

Authors:  A Cheadle; D Pearson; E Wagner; B M Psaty; P Diehr; T Koepsell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Effects of enhanced calling efforts on response rates, estimates of health behavior, and costs in a telephone health survey using random-digit dialing.

Authors:  A R Kristal; E White; J R Davis; G Corycell; T Raghunathan; S Kinne; T K Lin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Determinants of need and unmet need among cancer patients residing at home.

Authors:  V Mor; S M Allen; K Siegel; P Houts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A community-based approach to preventing alcohol use among adolescents on an American Indian reservation.

Authors:  A Cheadle; D Pearson; E Wagner; B M Psaty; P Diehr; T Koepsell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Using community indicators to assess nutrition in Arizona-Mexico border communities.

Authors:  Jacob Abarca; Sulabha Ramachandran
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Ten Steps to Conducting a Large, Multi-Site, Longitudinal Investigation of Language and Reading in Young Children.

Authors:  Kelly Farquharson; Kimberly A Murphy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.