Literature DB >> 20667335

Midterm results of mitral valve repair: closed versus open annuloplasty ring.

Dan Spiegelstein1, Yaron Moshkovitz, Leonid Sternik, Micha S Fienberg, Alexander Kogan, Ateret Malachy, Ehud Raanani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closed and open annuloplasty rings are both used for mitral valve repair. This study compared the clinical and echocardiographic results in patients with degenerative mitral disease undergoing MV repair with closed semirigid rings vs open bands.
METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, 377 patients (mean age, 59 + or - 12 years) underwent mitral valve repair. Valve pathology was degenerative in 273 (72%). Closed rings were used in 163 (60%) and open rings in 110 (40%). Patients had similar characteristics and comorbidities. In addition to annuloplasty, repair techniques included leaflet resection (48% and 77%, p < 0.01), artificial chordal (55% and 36%, p < 0.01), and edge-to-edge repair (4% and 4%, p = 0.79), in closed and open groups, respectively.
RESULTS: One patient in each group died (0.7%). Mean follow-up was 19 + or - 14 (closed group) and 34 + or - 15 months (open group; p < 0.01). Freedom from reoperation was 97.5% (closed group) vs 96.5% (open group). At follow-up, New York Heart Association functional class was similar between groups, and 91% in the closed group and 84% in the open group were free from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (p = 0.05). Closed group patients had a longer line of leaflet coaptation (9.1 + or - 2.7 mm) vs the open group (7.1 + or - 1.9 mm; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with closed semirigid annuloplasty rings demonstrated significantly longer lines of leaflet coaptation and tendency toward better echocardiographic midterm results than patients with open bands and may, therefore, benefit from improved repair durability. Copyright 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20667335     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Augmented mitral valve leaflet area decreases leaflet stress: a finite element simulation.

Authors:  Chun Xu; Arminder S Jassar; Derek P Nathan; Thomas J Eperjesi; Clayton J Brinster; Melissa M Levack; Mathieu Vergnat; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Benjamin M Jackson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Post-repair coaptation length and durability of mitral valve repair for posterior mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  Tomoya Uchimuro; Minoru Tabata; Kiyomi Saito; Kentaro Shibayama; Hiroyuki Watanabe; Toshihiro Fukui; Tomoki Shimokawa; Hitoshi Kasegawa; Shuichiro Takanashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-05

Review 3.  Mitral valve repair over five decades.

Authors:  Jerome Jouan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

4.  Impact of type and size of annuloplasty prosthesis on hemodynamic status after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

Authors:  Arudo Hiraoka; Akihiro Hayashida; Misako Toki; Genta Chikazawa; Hidenori Yoshitaka; Kiyoshi Yoshida; Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-04-24

5.  Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Ayse Cetinkaya; Maryam Waheed; Karin Bramlage; Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos; Mohamed Zeriouh; Stefan Hein; Peter Bramlage; Markus Schönburg; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Manfred Richter
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Flow adjusted transmitral pressure gradient as a modified indicator of functional mitral stenosis after repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Arudo Hiraoka; Akihiro Hayashida; Toshinori Totusgawa; Misako Toki; Genta Chikazawa; Hidenori Yoshitaka; Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.778

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.