Literature DB >> 20667139

Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria as a prognosticator for outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a case-control study.

Shingo Chihara1, Kyle J Popovich, Robert A Weinstein, Bala Hota.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When Staphylococcus aureus is isolated in urine, it is thought to usually represent hematogenous spread. Because such spread might have special clinical significance, we evaluated predictors and outcomes of S. aureus bacteriuria among patients with S. aureus bacteremia.
METHODS: A case-control study was performed at John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County among adult inpatients during January 2002-December 2006. Cases and controls had positive and negative urine cultures, respectively, for S. aureus, within 72 hours of positive blood culture for S. aureus. Controls were sampled randomly in a 1:4 ratio. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done.
RESULTS: Overall, 59% of patients were African-American, 12% died, 56% of infections had community-onset infections, and 58% were infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Among 61 cases and 247 controls, predictors of S. aureus bacteriuria on multivariate analysis were urological surgery (OR = 3.4, p = 0.06) and genitourinary infection (OR = 9.2, p = 0.002). Among patients who died, there were significantly more patients with bacteriuria than among patients who survived (39% vs. 17%; p = 0.002). In multiple Cox regression analysis, death risks in bacteremic patients were bacteriuria (hazard ratio 2.9, CI 1.4-5.9, p = 0.004), bladder catheter use (2.0, 1.0-4.0, p = 0.06), and Charlson score (1.1, 1.1-1.3, p = 0.02). Neither length of stay nor methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was a predictor of S. aureus bacteriuria or death.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with S. aureus bacteremia, those with S. aureus bacteriuria had 3-fold higher mortality than those without bacteriuria, even after adjustment for comorbidities. Bacteriuria may identify patients with more severe bacteremia, who are at risk of worse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20667139      PMCID: PMC2920260          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Bacteriuria with Staphylococcus aureus is postulated to occur through a limited number of mechanisms--primarily ascending spread after instrumentation (e.g., urologic procedures or urethral catheterization) or hematogenous seeding of the genitourinary tract. The finding by Lee et al., that bacteremia is strongly associated with bacteriuria among patients infected with S. aureus, supports the notion that bacteremia is an important precursor for bacteriuria [1]. What is less clear, however, is whether in patients with S. aureus bacteremia, the finding of S. aureus in the urine holds any prognostic significance. Among patients with S. aureus bacteremia, there are many prognostic factors, including host factors or comorbidities (age [2-10], Charlson score [2,11], immunosuppression [4], alcoholism [4], hemodialysis [4], acute renal failure [4], diabetes mellitus [8], recent hospitalization [11], mechanical ventilation [5], and acute severity of illness [12]); pathogen-specific factors (MRSA [3,13] superantigenic toxin production [14]); or characteristics of clinical presentation or management (meningitis [13] or altered mental status [11,12], community-acquired infection [4], severe sepsis or septic shock [3,4,6,7], lack of an infectious disease consult [4,15], prior antibiotic therapy [6], unknown [8] or persisting foci of infection [16], daily dose of penicillinase-stable penicillin < 4 grams [16], and inappropriate empiric treatment [6,12] or duration of treatment < 14 days [16]). The relation of occurrence of bacteriuria to outcome has been postulated [17], but the interactions with other risk factors warrant investigation. That bacteriuria might be a predictor of worse outcome in S. aureus bacteremia has biologic plausibility. For example, several innate defense mechanisms exist that prevent the development of urinary tract seeding in bacteremic patients: defensins, Toll-like receptor 4, and chemokine receptor CXCR1 [18,19], and these innate defenses may be overcome and the urinary tract seeded in the setting of higher bacterial loads [20]. Over the last 20 years, MRSA has emerged as an important cause of nosocomial bacteremia [21], and significant increases in the incidence of MRSA infections in community patients have been observed in the past few years [22-24]. Methicillin-resistance is a major risk for increased morbidity and mortality in S. aureus infection. Given the increasing burden of infection by community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections [22-24] and the suggestion that CA-MRSA strains may have greater virulence, predictors of morbidity and mortality are essential for allocation of clinical infections. We hypothesized that for patients with S. aureus bacteremia, bacteriuria is an important marker of disease severity and predictor of worse outcomes. We examined this hypothesis by evaluating outcomes of S. aureus bacteremia in patients with and without bacteriuria. We also examined the impact of methicillin-resistance on outcomes among patients with S. aureus bacteremia with and without bacteriuria. Finally, using our cohort, we examined the predictors of bacteriuria.

Methods

Setting

A case-control study was performed for patients admitted to John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, a 464-bed inner-city safety-net hospital in Chicago, Illinois. The institutional review board reviewed the study and deemed it exempt from review.

Study Design and Definitions

Our study included in-patients during January 2002 through December 2006. Cases were patients who had a positive urine culture for S. aureus within 72 hours of a positive blood culture for S. aureus. Controls were patients who had a negative urine culture for S. aureus within 72 hours of a positive blood culture S. aureus. Control patients were randomly sampled from all eligible patients with S. aureus bacteremia but without bacteriuria (i.e., with negative urine cultures), with the aim of 4 controls per case. Subsequently, chart reviews were performed and exclusion criteria were applied to sampled putative cases and controls to create a cohort for analysis. Patients who were younger than age 18 years, who were seen only in the emergency department or in the clinic, or who did not have a urine culture performed within 72 hours of the positive blood cultures, were excluded. Only the first episode of S. aureus bacteremia per admission was assessed. Using electronic data and chart review, we collected demographic and clinical data including mortality, ICU admission, length of stay, age, race, sex, Charlson score [25], comorbidities (HIV, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis), alcoholism, intravenous drug use, presence of indwelling bladder catheter at the time of culture, previous urological procedure, duration of fever, duration of bloodstream infection, urinary symptoms, duration of chief complaint, organs and sites infected by S. aureus decided by the clinician, evidence of foreign material, susceptibilities of S. aureus, and time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. For patients who died during their hospitalization, death was attributed to the bacteremia if so noted by the patient's discharge diagnosis or when there was a positive blood culture within 1 week preceding death. S. aureus was deemed hospital-acquired if illness had onset > 72 hours after hospital admission. Cultures that turned positive within 72 hours of admission--community-onset--were divided into 2 groups: healthcare-associated infection was defined based on history of hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long-term care facility within 1 year or a presence of an indwelling catheter or percutaneous medical device (e.g., tracheostomy tube, gastrostomy tube, or bladder catheter) or a prior MRSA infection; patients with community-acquired infection did not have any of these risk factors [26].

Statistical Methods

Categorical variables were examined with chi-square analysis and continuous variables were analyzed with the independent samples t test. For multivariable analysis, statistically important factors with p values <0.10 on univariate analysis were included in initial models, and Charlson score was included a priori based on the strong association between comorbidities and death, and our desire to appropriately adjust for comorbidities in our analysis. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to assess the association of bacteriuria with time to S. aureus death or hospital discharge, adjusted for suspected effect modifiers as identified in univariate analysis. Explanatory variables were evaluated for adherence to the proportional hazards assumption. To assess the multivariable predictors of bacteriuria, logistic regression was used. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 15.0, Chicago, IL).

Results

During 5 years (January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006), 67 patients with S. aureus bacteremia and bacteriuria were identified, and control sampling yielded 268 bacteremic, non - bacteriuric patients. Following chart reviews and application of exclusion criteria, there were 61 cases and 247 controls. Of all 308 episodes of bacteremia, 128 (41.6%) were due to MRSA. The mean age of pooled dataset, created by joining case and control patients was 48.3 years; 68.5% were male, 181 (58.8%) were African-American, and 37 (12.0%) died during hospital admission. Sites involved by bacteremia were cardiac valves [31 (10.7%)], vascular catheters [59 (19.2%)], skin/soft tissue [57 (18.5%)], bone/joints [27 (8.8%)], lungs [41 (13.3%)], genitourinary tracts [22 (7.1%)], and other sites [11 (3.6%)]; for 106 (36.7%) patients, there was no documented organ involvement other than bloodstream. Hospital mortality rates were higher in S. aureus bacteremia patients with bacteriuria compared to patients without bacteriuria (39% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.002) (table 1). In multiple Cox regression (table 2), significant predictors of death were positive urine culture (Hazard ratio 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-5.9, p = 0.004), indwelling bladder catheter (2.0; 95% CI, 0.97-4.0, p = 0.06), and Charlson score (1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, p = 0.02); vascular catheter infection or phlebitis was associated with lower risk of death (0.27; 95% CI, 0.060-1.2, p = 0.09). Cox regression showed a significantly higher mortality rate in case than in control patients (figure 1). Neither methicillin-resistance nor the specific strain types of MRSA were predictors of mortality in univariate or multivariable analysis.
Table 1

Univariate analysis of predictors of death during admission among patients with S. aureus bacteremia and a contemporaneous urine culture obtained a

Risk FactorbDeath during admissionNo death during admissionOR (95% CI)P value
N36253

Demographics

Male22 (61)176 (70)0.31

Race/Ethnicity0.46

 Black22 (61)145 (50)

 Hispanic9 (25)44 (15)

 Other race2 (6)23 (8)

 White3 (8)41 (14)

Age51.6 (15.8)47.6 (15.3)0.15

Microbiological Factors

Epidemiologic risk0.76

 Community associated11 (31)69 (27)

 Healthcare associated8 (22)71 (28)

 Hospital onset17 (47)113 (45)

MRSA17 (47)103 (41)0.46

Urine culture positive14 (39)43 (17)3.11 (1.47 - 6.55)0.002

Clinical Factors

HIV6 (17)28 (11)0.32

Bladder catheter19 (53)86 (34)2.17 (1.07 - 4.39)0.03

Charlson score2.842.040.22

Hemodialysis1 (3)26 (11)0.24 (0.03 - 1.90)0.15

Immunosuppressed8 (22)45 (18)0.52

Urological surgery0 (0)13 (5)0.16

DM13 (36)70 (28)0.30

IVDA4 (11)42 (17)0.40

Prosthetic device3 (8)63 (25)0.27 (0.08-0.92)0.03

Alcoholism7 (19)40 (16)0.58

ID consult or managementc18 (50)128 (60)0.25

Line/phlebitis2 (6)56 (22)0.21 (0.05-0.89)0.02

Skin soft tissue infection7 (19)50 (20)0.96

Bone/joint infection2 (6)25 (25)0.40

Pulmonary infection6 (17)35 (14)0.65

GU infection0 (0)22 (9)0.05

Incubation Period26.8 (67.4)12.4 (24.0)0.21

Outcome

Fever days2.7 (4.8)3.7 (5.0)0.11

Time to effective therapy1.06 (2.6) days1.8 (3.7) days0.12

Length of stay after culture10.1 (11.3) days13.5 (14.1) days0.17

Footnotes: a Contemporaneous urine cultures are performed within 72 hours of the blood culture. bData represent count (%) and mean (standard deviation) for count and continuous data, respectively. cPatient management was either primarily by infectious diseases clinician or with infectious diseases consultation.

Table 2

Multiple Cox regression analysis of factors predictive of death among patients with S. aureus bacteremia with one contemporaneous urine culture obtained

Risk factorHazard Ratio (95% CI)P value
Urine culture positive for S. aureus2.87 (1.411-5.851)0.004

Bladder catheter present1.96 (0.966-3.965)0.063

Line infection/phlebitis0.268 (0.060-1.199)0.085

Charlson score1.183 (1.063-1.316)0.018
Figure 1

Cox regression for survival analysis for .

Univariate analysis of predictors of death during admission among patients with S. aureus bacteremia and a contemporaneous urine culture obtained a Footnotes: a Contemporaneous urine cultures are performed within 72 hours of the blood culture. bData represent count (%) and mean (standard deviation) for count and continuous data, respectively. cPatient management was either primarily by infectious diseases clinician or with infectious diseases consultation. Multiple Cox regression analysis of factors predictive of death among patients with S. aureus bacteremia with one contemporaneous urine culture obtained Cox regression for survival analysis for . More positive urine cultures were seen in community-onset (both community-acquired and healthcare-associated) compared to hospital-acquired bacteremia (46% vs 23%, respectively, p < 0.001); in HIV-positive patients compared to HIV-negative patients (19% vs 10%, p = 0.05); and in patients with recent urological surgery (11% vs 3%, p = 0.03) or genitourinary infection (21% vs 4%, p < 0.001) compared with those without genitourinary problems (table 3). In multivariable analysis (table 4), urological surgery (OR 4.5, p = 0.045) and genitourinary infection (OR 5.7, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with positive urine cultures.
Table 3

Univariate analysis of risk factors for bacteriuria among patients with S. aureus bacteremia

Risk FactoraUrine culture positiveUrine culture negativeOR (95% CI)P value
N57232

Demographics

Age49.1 (13.8)47.9 (13.8)0.59

Male40 (70)158 (68)0.76

Race/Ethnicity0.10

 Black26 (46)141 (61)

 Hispanic14 (25)39 (17)

 Other Race4 (7)21 (9)

 White13 (22)31 (13)

Microbiological factor

 Epidemiological Risk

 Community onset26 (46)54 (23)<0.001

 Healthcare associated18 (32)61 (26)

 Hospital onset13 (23)117 (50)

MRSA21 (37)99(43)0.42

Clinical Factors

Immunosuppressed9 (16)44 (19)0.58

Incubation Period15.7 (30.5)13.8 (33.4)0.68

Charlson Score2.052.150.801

Hemodialysis3 (5)24 (10)0.24

HIV11 (19)23 (10)2.17 (1.00 - 4.77)0.05

Endocarditis7 (12)17 (7)0.22

Bladder catheter20 (35)85 (37)0.83

Urological surgery6 (11)7 (3)3.78 (1.22 - 11.73)0.03

DM19 (33)64 (28)0.39

IVDA7 (12)39 (17)0.40

Prosthetic device11 (19)55 (24)0.48

Alcoholism11 (19)36 (16)0.49

Line infection/phlebitis6 (11)52 (22)0.41 (0.17 - 1.00)0.05

Skin soft tissue infection10 (18)47 (20)0.64

Bone/joint infection7 (12)20 (9)0.39

Pulmonary infection12 (21)29 (13)1.87 (0.89 - 3.94)0.10

GU infection12 (21)10 (4)5.92 (2.41 - 14.54)<0.001

Footnotes: aData represent count (%) and mean(standard deviation) for count and continuous data, respectively.

Table 4

Multiple Cox regression analysis of risk factors for bacteriuria in patients with S. aureus bacteremia

Risk factorOR (95% CI)P value
Urological surgery4.47 (1.03-19.30)0.045

GU infection5.70 (1.90-17.12)0.002

Factors included in Backward LR analysis: location of acquired infection (community-acquired vs hospital-acquired vs healthcare-associated); race; urological surgery; presence of lung infection; presence of genitourinary tract infection; duration of bloodstream infection

Univariate analysis of risk factors for bacteriuria among patients with S. aureus bacteremia Footnotes: aData represent count (%) and mean(standard deviation) for count and continuous data, respectively. Multiple Cox regression analysis of risk factors for bacteriuria in patients with S. aureus bacteremia Factors included in Backward LR analysis: location of acquired infection (community-acquired vs hospital-acquired vs healthcare-associated); race; urological surgery; presence of lung infection; presence of genitourinary tract infection; duration of bloodstream infection

Discussion

In our case-control study, patients who had S. aureus bacteremia and a positive urine culture for S. aureus had significantly higher mortality than did bacteremic patients with a negative urine culture. This was true even after adjustment for multiple covariates including use of bladder catheters, presence or absence of lower urinary tract symptoms, or recent urological surgeries, which are known risk factors for a positive urine culture, significant factor in the multivariable analysis such as presence of line infection or phlebitis or presence of comorbidities as measured by the Charlson score [2,11]. The conclusion that S. aureus bacteriuria patients have worse prognosis compared to patients without S. aureus bacteriuria among S. aureus bacteremia patients may be useful to clinicians when deciding whether to monitor a patient on the ward or the ICU and when explaining the prognosis of the illness to the patient and his family. S. aureus is a common pathogen in the community and in hospitals. S aureus causes significant mortality and morbidity but is an infrequent cause of urinary tract infection [27]. In patients with S. aureus bacteremia, a positive urine culture is typically attributed to ascending infection or to hematogenous spread. Predictors of a positive urine culture for S. aureus include presence of indwelling bladder catheters, urinary tract obstruction, instrumentation, or surgery [27,28]. We hypothesized that S. aureus appears in the urine in bacteremic patients because of higher burden of organisms and thus may portend worse outcome. A recent study examining the relationship of bacteriuria with mortality found a two-fold increased risk of death in patients with concomitant S. aureus bacteriuria and bacteremia [17]. The current study adds to published literature by including significant numbers of methicillin-resistant isolates and by using statistical methods appropriate for varying time at risk. The association of bacteriuria with increased risk of mortality even after adjustment for comorbidities was similar in both studies, suggesting that bacteriuria provides useful prognostic information in the setting of S. aureus bacteremia. In addition, based on our findings, it appears that this is an effect independent of methicillin-resistance and that secular trends in incidence of MRSA are unlikely to alter this association. There are several limitations to our study. The patients in the study were cared for at a single center and it may be difficult to generalize our findings to other hospitals. The Cook County Bureau of Health Services is the largest provider of indigent care in Cook County and has seen large increases in rates of community-associated S. aureus infection, and our estimates likely represent robust measures of risk for mortality. A second limitation is that this was a retrospective study and depended on documentation in the chart, which may have resulted in misclassification errors in assessing comorbidities and other covariates. Non-differential misclassification tends to bias towards the null, which suggests that our estimates of risk are likely conservative. In addition, electronic data were used in this study and were prospectively collected at the time of care; these data were not subject to problems inherent in reviews of written documentation Finally, in our study, we had an overall mortality rate of 12% which was at the lower end of published mortality rates--12-46% [3-13,27,29,30]--in this setting, suggesting that our cohort may have had fewer comorbidities and lower attributable mortality that in other published data. This may be a result of the significant burden of CA-MRSA in our patient population.

Conclusions

In patients with S. aureus bacteremia, a positive urine culture for S. aureus may be used to identify patients at higher risk of death. Patients who have S. aureus bacteremia and more comorbidities are at increased risk for higher mortality rate.

Competing interests

Bala Hota is a member of the speaker's bureau for Pfizer. All other authors have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SC participated in the design of the study, performed the chart reviews, participated in some statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. KJP participated in obtaining the data for the study and proofreading the manuscript. RAW participated in the design of the study and proofreading the manuscript. BH participated in the design of the study, performed statistical analysis and proofread the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/225/prepub
  30 in total

1.  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Concomitant Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria is associated with poor clinical outcome in adults with S. aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  P J Huggan; D R Murdoch; K Gallagher; S T Chambers
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Prospective study of 114 consecutive episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  J M Mylotte; C McDermott; J A Spooner
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

5.  Mortality associated with nosocomial bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Romero-Vivas; M Rubio; C Fernandez; J J Picazo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria.

Authors:  P J Demuth; D N Gerding; K Crossley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-01

7.  Role of comorbidity in mortality related to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a prospective study using the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity.

Authors:  Olivier Lesens; Cédric Methlin; Yves Hansmann; Véronique Remy; Martin Martinot; Colm Bergin; Pierre Meyer; Daniel Christmann
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  The association between Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and bacteriuria.

Authors:  B K Lee; K Crossley; D N Gerding
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients.

Authors:  V G Fowler; L L Sanders; D J Sexton; L Kong; K A Marr; A K Gopal; G Gottlieb; R S McClelland; G R Corey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  The clinical significance of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria.

Authors:  M Arpi; J Renneberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria: an updated review.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis; Dimitra Kalemaki
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  [Urosepsis].

Authors:  Mathias W Pletz; Sebastian Weis; Christina Forstner; Florian Wagenlehner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Urosepsis].

Authors:  Mathias W Pletz; Sebastian Weis; Christina Forstner; Florian Wagenlehner
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Sebastian J van Hal; Slade O Jensen; Vikram L Vaska; Björn A Espedido; David L Paterson; Iain B Gosbell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection surveillance: National Healthcare Safety Network's laboratory-identified event reporting versus traditional laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection surveillance.

Authors:  Arthur W Baker; Michael J Durkin; Kristen V Dicks; Sarah S Lewis; Rebekah W Moehring; Luke F Chen; Daniel J Sexton; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriuria: Source, Clinical Relevance, and Management.

Authors:  Mayar Al Mohajer; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Agreement between Parallel Canine Blood and Urine Cultures: Is Urine Culture the Poor Man's Blood Culture?

Authors:  Nanelle R Barash; Adam J Birkenheuer; Shelly L Vaden; Megan E Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Unexpected Multidrug Resistance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Urine Samples: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Andreas Lunacek; Uwe Koenig; Christof Mrstik; Christian Radmayr; Wolfgang Horninger; Eugen Plas
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  Epidemiology and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and sepsis in a Norwegian county 1996-2011: an observational study.

Authors:  Julie Paulsen; Arne Mehl; Åsa Askim; Erik Solligård; Bjørn Olav Åsvold; Jan Kristian Damås
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  A Narrative Review on the Role of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriuria in S. aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Franziska Schuler; Peter J Barth; Silke Niemann; Frieder Schaumburg
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.