Ajay D Wasan1, Nina K Anderson, Donald B Giddon. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. awasan@partners.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine pain levels, function, and psychological symptoms in relation to predominant sidedness of pain (right or left) and gender in patients being treated for chronic spinal pain. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic neck or low back pain undergoing a nerve block procedure in a specialty pain medicine clinic. INTERVENTIONS/OUTCOMES: Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Brief Pain Inventory just prior to the procedure. Pain history and demographic variables were collected from a chart review. Chi-square, Pearson correlations, and multivariate statistics were used to characterize the relationships between side of pain, gender, pain levels, pain interference, and psychological symptoms. RESULTS: Among 519 subjects, men with left-sided pain (N = 98) were found to have significantly greater depression and anxiety symptoms and worse pain-related quality of life (P < 0.01), despite having similar pain levels as men with right-sided pain (N = 91) or women with left- or right-sided pain (N = 289). In men, psychological symptoms had a significantly greater correlation with pain levels than in women (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this sample, men with left-sided spinal pain report worse quality of life and more psychological symptoms than women. These data provide clinical evidence corroborating basic neuroscience findings indicating that the right cerebral hemisphere is preferentially involved in the processing of pain and negative affect. These data suggest that men appear more right hemisphere dominant in pain and affect processing. These findings have implications for multidisciplinary assessment and treatment planning in men. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To determine pain levels, function, and psychological symptoms in relation to predominant sidedness of pain (right or left) and gender in patients being treated for chronic spinal pain. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic neck or low back pain undergoing a nerve block procedure in a specialty pain medicine clinic. INTERVENTIONS/OUTCOMES: Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Brief Pain Inventory just prior to the procedure. Pain history and demographic variables were collected from a chart review. Chi-square, Pearson correlations, and multivariate statistics were used to characterize the relationships between side of pain, gender, pain levels, pain interference, and psychological symptoms. RESULTS: Among 519 subjects, men with left-sided pain (N = 98) were found to have significantly greater depression and anxiety symptoms and worse pain-related quality of life (P < 0.01), despite having similar pain levels as men with right-sided pain (N = 91) or women with left- or right-sided pain (N = 289). In men, psychological symptoms had a significantly greater correlation with pain levels than in women (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this sample, men with left-sided spinal pain report worse quality of life and more psychological symptoms than women. These data provide clinical evidence corroborating basic neuroscience findings indicating that the right cerebral hemisphere is preferentially involved in the processing of pain and negative affect. These data suggest that men appear more right hemisphere dominant in pain and affect processing. These findings have implications for multidisciplinary assessment and treatment planning in men. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Laurie B Burke; Richard Gershon; Margaret Rothman; Jane Scott; Robert R Allen; Hampton J Atkinson; Julie Chandler; Charles Cleeland; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; David Kellstein; Robert D Kerns; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Mitchell B Max; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Dwight E Moulin; Turo Nurmikko; Steve Quessy; Srinivasa Raja; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; James P Robinson; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Gerold Stucki; Jane Tollett; Thorsten von Stein; Mark S Wallace; Joachim Wernicke; Richard E White; Amanda C Williams; James Witter; Kathleen W Wyrwich Journal: Pain Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Mark V Boswell; Andrea M Trescot; Sukdeb Datta; David M Schultz; Hans C Hansen; Salahadin Abdi; Nalini Sehgal; Rinoo V Shah; Vijay Singh; Ramsin M Benyamin; Vikram B Patel; Ricardo M Buenaventura; James D Colson; Harold J Cordner; Richard S Epter; Joseph F Jasper; Elmer E Dunbar; Sairam L Atluri; Richard C Bowman; Timothy R Deer; John R Swicegood; Peter S Staats; Howard S Smith; Allen W Burton; David S Kloth; James Giordano; Laxmaiah Manchikanti Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Ajay D Wasan; Edward Michna; Robert R Edwards; Jeffrey N Katz; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; Andrew J Dolman; David Janfaza; Zach Isaac; Robert N Jamison Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Anne Margarette S Maallo; Eric A Moulton; Christine B Sieberg; Donald B Giddon; David Borsook; Scott A Holmes Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 9.052
Authors: Sina Kim; Hye-Yoon Lee; Nam-Kwen Kim; Tae Han Yook; Eun-Sung Seo; Jong Uk Kim Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.186