Literature DB >> 20666802

Challenges and opportunities in implementing managed relocation for conservation of freshwater species.

Julian D Olden1, Mark J Kennard, Joshua J Lawler, N Leroy Poff.   

Abstract

The rapidity of climate change is predicted to exceed the ability of many species to adapt or to disperse to more climatically favorable surroundings. Conservation of these species may require managed relocation (also called assisted migration or assisted colonization) of individuals to locations where the probability of their future persistence may be higher. The history of non-native species throughout the world suggests managed relocation may not be applicable universally. Given the constrained existence of freshwater organisms within highly dendritic networks containing isolated ponds, lakes, and rivers, managed relocation may represent a useful conservation strategy. Yet, these same distinctive properties of freshwater ecosystems may increase the probability of unintended ecological consequences. We explored whether managed relocation is an ecologically sound conservation strategy for freshwater systems and provided guidelines for identifying candidates and localities for managed relocation. A comparison of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater animals associated with high probabilities of extirpation and invasion suggests that it is possible to select species for managed relocation to minimize the likelihood of unintended effects to recipient ecosystems. We recommend that translocations occur within the species' historical range and optimally within the same major river basin and that lacustrine and riverine species be translocated to physically isolated seepage lakes and upstream of natural or artificial barriers, respectively, to lower the risk of secondary spread across the landscape. We provide five core recommendations to enhance the scientific basis of guidelines for managed relocation in freshwater environments: adopt the term managed translocation to reflect the fact that individuals will not always be reintroduced within their historical native range; examine the trade-off between facilitation of individual movement and the probability of range expansion of non-native species; determine which species and locations might be immediately considered for managed translocation; adopt a hypothetico-deductive framework by conducting experimental trials to introduce species of conservation concern into new areas within their historical range; build on previous research associated with species reintroductions through communication and synthesis of case studies. ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20666802     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  Comparing the ecological impacts of native and invasive crayfish: could native species' translocation do more harm than good?

Authors:  J James; F M Slater; I P Vaughan; K A Young; J Cable
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Influence of Land-Use Classes on the Functional Structure of Fish Communities in Southern Brazilian Headwater Streams.

Authors:  Amanda Saldanha Barbosa; Mateus Marques Pires; Uwe Horst Schulz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Growth of Lahontan cutthroat trout from multiple sources re-introduced into Sagehen Creek, CA.

Authors:  Jonathan E Stead; Virginia L Boucher; Peter B Moyle; Andrew L Rypel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Species traits and reduced habitat suitability limit efficacy of climate change refugia in streams.

Authors:  Matthew J Troia; Anna L Kaz; J Cameron Niemeyer; Xingli Giam
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 19.100

5.  Assessing and managing freshwater ecosystems vulnerable to environmental change.

Authors:  David G Angeler; Craig R Allen; Hannah E Birgé; Stina Drakare; Brendan G McKie; Richard K Johnson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Integrating population genetics and species distribution modelling to guide conservation of the noble crayfish, Astacus astacus, in Croatia.

Authors:  Leona Lovrenčić; Martina Temunović; Riho Gross; Marin Grgurev; Ivana Maguire
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Life and death in a dynamic environment: Invasive trout, floods, and intraspecific drivers of translocated populations.

Authors:  Brian D Healy; Phaedra Budy; Mary M Conner; Emily C Omana Smith
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.105

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.