BACKGROUND: Factors promoting the emergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) connection domain mutations and their effect on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are still largely undetermined. We investigated this matter by analyzing genotypic resistance tests covering 400 amino acid positions in the RT of HIV-1 subtype B viruses and corresponding treatment histories and laboratory measurements. METHODS: The emergence of connection domain mutations was studied in 334 patients receiving monotherapy or dual therapy with thymidine analogues at the time of the genotypic resistance test. Response to subsequent combination ART (cART) was analyzed using Cox regression for 291 patients receiving unboosted protease inhibitors. Response was defined by ever reaching an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL during the first cART. RESULTS: The connection domain mutations N348I, R356K, R358K, A360V, and A371V were more frequently observed in ART-exposed than ART-naive patients, of which only N348I and A360V were nonpolymorphic (with a prevalence of <1.5% in untreated patients). N348I correlated with M184V and predominantly occurred in patients receiving lamivudine and zidovudine concomitantly. A360V was not associated with specific drug combinations and was found to emerge later than M184V or thymidine analogue mutations. Nonpolymorphic connection domain mutations were rarely detected in the absence of established drug resistance mutations in ART-exposed individuals (prevalence, <1%). None of the 5 connection domain mutations associated with treatment showed a statistically significant effect on response to cART. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their frequent emergence, connection domain mutations did not show large detrimental effects on response to cART. Currently, routine implementation of connection domain sequencing seems unnecessary for developed health care settings.
BACKGROUND: Factors promoting the emergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) connection domain mutations and their effect on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are still largely undetermined. We investigated this matter by analyzing genotypic resistance tests covering 400 amino acid positions in the RT of HIV-1 subtype B viruses and corresponding treatment histories and laboratory measurements. METHODS: The emergence of connection domain mutations was studied in 334 patients receiving monotherapy or dual therapy with thymidine analogues at the time of the genotypic resistance test. Response to subsequent combination ART (cART) was analyzed using Cox regression for 291 patients receiving unboosted protease inhibitors. Response was defined by ever reaching an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL during the first cART. RESULTS: The connection domain mutations N348I, R356K, R358K, A360V, and A371V were more frequently observed in ART-exposed than ART-naive patients, of which only N348I and A360V were nonpolymorphic (with a prevalence of <1.5% in untreated patients). N348I correlated with M184V and predominantly occurred in patients receiving lamivudine and zidovudine concomitantly. A360V was not associated with specific drug combinations and was found to emerge later than M184V or thymidine analogue mutations. Nonpolymorphic connection domain mutations were rarely detected in the absence of established drug resistance mutations in ART-exposed individuals (prevalence, <1%). None of the 5 connection domain mutations associated with treatment showed a statistically significant effect on response to cART. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their frequent emergence, connection domain mutations did not show large detrimental effects on response to cART. Currently, routine implementation of connection domain sequencing seems unnecessary for developed health care settings.
Authors: Victoria A Johnson; Vincent Calvez; Huldrych F Günthard; Roger Paredes; Deenan Pillay; Robert Shafer; Annemarie M Wensing; Douglas D Richman Journal: Top Antivir Med Date: 2011-11
Authors: Jessica H Brehm; Christina M Lalama; Michael D Hughes; Richard Haubrich; Sharon A Riddler; Nicolas Sluis-Cremer; John W Mellors Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Maria F M Barral; Arielly K P Sousa; André F Santos; Celina M Abreu; Amilcar Tanuri; Marcelo A Soares Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Annemarie M Wensing; Vincent Calvez; Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein; Charlotte Charpentier; Huldrych F Günthard; Roger Paredes; Robert W Shafer; Douglas D Richman Journal: Top Antivir Med Date: 2019-09
Authors: Jessica H Brehm; Dianna L Koontz; Carole L Wallis; Kathleen A Shutt; Ian Sanne; Robin Wood; James A McIntyre; Wendy S Stevens; Nicolas Sluis-Cremer; John W Mellors Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Renan B Lengruber; Krista A Delviks-Frankenberry; Galina N Nikolenko; Jessica Baumann; André F Santos; Vinay K Pathak; Marcelo A Soares Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Maria E Cilento; Aaron B Reeve; Eleftherios Michailidis; Tatiana V Ilina; Eva Nagy; Hiroaki Mitsuya; Michael A Parniak; Philip R Tedbury; Stefan G Sarafianos Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Krista A Delviks-Frankenberry; Renan B Lengruber; Andre F Santos; Jussara M Silveira; Marcelo A Soares; Mary F Kearney; Frank Maldarelli; Vinay K Pathak Journal: Virology Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 3.616