OBJECTIVE: Delirium is the most common acute neuropsychiatric disorder in hospitalized elderly. Assessment of the severity of delirium is important for adjusting medication. The minimal dose of medication is preferable to prevent side effects. Only few nurse based severity measures are available. The aim of this study was to validate a scale developed to assess symptoms of delirium during regular nursing care, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) Scale, for monitoring severity of delirium. METHOD: Delirious patients of 65 years and older were included. Delirium was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria and the Confusion Assessment Method. The DOS Scale was compared to the Dutch version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Global cognitive functioning was assessed by the Informant Questionnaire Cognitive Decline in the Elderly-Short Form (IQCODE-SF) and the KATZ-ADL Scale was used for functional impairment. RESULTS: Ninety seven delirious patients were included: 41 hip fracture patients and 56 medical patients. The correlation between total DRS-R-98 scores and DOS Scale scores was 0.67 (p=0.01). For the cognitive impaired group (IQCODE-SF ≥3.9) this correlation was 0.61 (p=0.01); for the group with no global cognitive impairment, this correlation was 0.67 (p=0.01). Correlations between DRS-R-98 and DOS Scale for hypoactive, hyperactive and mixed delirium subtype were 0.40 (p=0.32), 0.44 (p=0.01) and 0.69 (p=0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DOS Scale is able to measure severity of delirium. In routine daily clinical practice, the DOS Scale is a time-efficient, easy to use and reliable method for measuring and monitoring severity of delirium by nurses.
OBJECTIVE:Delirium is the most common acute neuropsychiatric disorder in hospitalized elderly. Assessment of the severity of delirium is important for adjusting medication. The minimal dose of medication is preferable to prevent side effects. Only few nurse based severity measures are available. The aim of this study was to validate a scale developed to assess symptoms of delirium during regular nursing care, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) Scale, for monitoring severity of delirium. METHOD: Delirious patients of 65 years and older were included. Delirium was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria and the Confusion Assessment Method. The DOS Scale was compared to the Dutch version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). Global cognitive functioning was assessed by the Informant Questionnaire Cognitive Decline in the Elderly-Short Form (IQCODE-SF) and the KATZ-ADL Scale was used for functional impairment. RESULTS: Ninety seven delirious patients were included: 41 hip fracturepatients and 56 medical patients. The correlation between total DRS-R-98 scores and DOS Scale scores was 0.67 (p=0.01). For the cognitive impaired group (IQCODE-SF ≥3.9) this correlation was 0.61 (p=0.01); for the group with no global cognitive impairment, this correlation was 0.67 (p=0.01). Correlations between DRS-R-98 and DOS Scale for hypoactive, hyperactive and mixed delirium subtype were 0.40 (p=0.32), 0.44 (p=0.01) and 0.69 (p=0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DOS Scale is able to measure severity of delirium. In routine daily clinical practice, the DOS Scale is a time-efficient, easy to use and reliable method for measuring and monitoring severity of delirium by nurses.
Authors: Amy Montgomery; Jo-Anne Todd; Cindy Jones; June Koroitamana; Laurie Grealish; Anne Wand; Stephen Billett; Andrew Teodorczuk Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 12.782
Authors: Jelle W Raats; Wilbert A van Eijsden; Rogier M P H Crolla; Ewout W Steyerberg; Lijckle van der Laan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carolien J Jansen; Anthony R Absalom; Geertruida H de Bock; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Gerbrand J Izaks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rikie M Scholtens; Sophia E J A de Rooij; Annelies E Vellekoop; Bart C Vrouenraets; Barbara C van Munster Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dunja Westhoff; Joost Witlox; Corneli van Aalst; Rikie M Scholtens; Sophia E de Rooij; Barbara C van Munster; Jos F M de Jonghe; Alexander P J Houdijk; Piet Eikelenboom; David J van Westerloo; Diederik van de Beek; Willem A van Gool; Leo Koenderman Journal: BBA Clin Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: Ferdinand Vogt; Susanne Wicklein; Markus Gosch; Jürgen Jessl; Wolfgang Hitzl; Theodor Fischlein; Matthias Pauschinger; Steffen Pfeiffer; Dennis Eckner Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.458