Literature DB >> 20665346

Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching.

Anthony J Metzger1, Alexander W Dromerick, Christopher N Schabowsky, Rahsaan J Holley, Brian Monroe, Peter S Lum.   

Abstract

The rate of upper-limb amputations is increasing, and the rejection rate of prosthetic devices remains high. People with upper-limb amputation do not fully incorporate prosthetic devices into their activities of daily living. By understanding the reaching behaviors of prosthesis users, researchers can alter prosthetic devices and develop training protocols to improve the acceptance of prosthetic limbs. By observing the reaching characteristics of the nondisabled arms of people with amputation, we can begin to understand how the brain alters its motor commands after amputation. We asked subjects to perform rapid reaching movements to two targets with and without visual feedback. Subjects performed the tasks with both their prosthetic and nondisabled arms. We calculated endpoint error, trajectory error, and variability and compared them with those of nondisabled control subjects. We found no significant abnormalities in the prosthetic limb. However, we found an abnormal leftward trajectory error (in right arms) in the nondisabled arm of prosthetic users in the vision condition. In the no-vision condition, the nondisabled arm displayed abnormal leftward endpoint errors and abnormally higher endpoint variability. In the vision condition, peak velocity was lower and movement duration was longer in both arms of subjects with amputation. These abnormalities may reflect the cortical reorganization associated with limb loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665346     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.06.0075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  15 in total

1.  Building an internal model of a myoelectric prosthesis via closed-loop control for consistent and routine grasping.

Authors:  Strahinja Dosen; Marko Markovic; Nicola Wille; Markus Henkel; Mario Koppe; Andrei Ninu; Cornelius Frömmel; Dario Farina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24

3.  Internal models of upper limb prosthesis users when grasping and lifting a fragile object with their prosthetic limb.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Iian Black; Rahsaan J Holley; Jessica Barth; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Remodeling of cortical activity for motor control following upper limb loss.

Authors:  Laura Williams; Nikta Pirouz; J C Mizelle; William Cusack; Rob Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cowley; Linda Resnik; Jason Wilken; Lisa Smurr Walters; Deanna Gates
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Influence of Perspective of Action Observation Training on Residual Limb Control in Naïve Prosthesis Usage.

Authors:  Delisa T Lawson; William F Cusack; Regan Lawson; Ashley Hardy; Robert Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Neural activation differences in amputees during imitation of intact versus amputee movements.

Authors:  William F Cusack; Michael Cope; Sheryl Nathanson; Nikta Pirouz; Robert Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Hanneke Bouwsema; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics.

Authors:  Laura H B Huinink; Hanneke Bouwsema; Dick H Plettenburg; Corry K van der Sluis; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Rebecca L Stine; Craig W Heckathorne; Stefania Fatone; Steven A Gard
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.