Literature DB >> 20665307

Respiratory issues in beef and pork production: recommendations from an expert panel.

Susanna Von Essen1, Gordon Moore, Shawn Gibbs, Kerry Leedom Larson.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes "Respiratory Issues in Confined Feeding Operations," a panel discussion at the Agricultural Safety and Health Council of America/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conference, "Be Safe, Be Profitable: Protecting Workers in Agriculture," Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, January 27-28, 2010. Occupational exposure to confined animal feeding operations is associated with cough, wheezing, and shortness of breath. Published data shows that 20% to 40% of hog confinement workers experience such symptoms, although most are able to continue working in this industry. Endotoxin is one component of hog barn dust that is associated with respiratory disease in workers. Endotoxin levels on cattle feedlots can also be in the range linked with occupational lung disease. The cattle industry has not yet prepared guidance documents for producers, in part because much less is known about the prevalence of lung disease in its workers. However, the pork industry provides information for pork producers on reducing their respiratory health risks through a multifaceted approach, including the use of respirators. Some jobs cannot be done safely without respiratory protection, such as entering manure pits. It is less clear for other jobs when respirators should be worn. Use of respiratory protection should be considered but not mandated for all persons working in close proximity to livestock in dusty conditions. A respiratory protection program may also serve as a cost effective biosecurity measure to protect animals from human pathogens such as influenza virus. Proper design and management of barn ventilation systems is critical for maintaining temperature and humidity levels for optimal animal growth; as well as decreasing the level of gases and respirable dusts. The pork and the cattle industries support occupational health and safety; however, the governmental guidance and recommendations for such programs are limited for the agricultural industries as a whole. The industries should lead the way in the effort to improve respiratory protection for workers. Overall, a team approach that includes input from managers, workers, and veterinarians is important for the reduction of respiratory hazards on livestock farms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665307     DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2010.486283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  8 in total

1.  Ambient Ammonia Exposures in an Agricultural Community and Pediatric Asthma Morbidity.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Michael Yost; Paul Sampson; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Victoria Breckwich Vasquez; Kris Hartin; Jenna Armstrong; Maria Tchong-French; Sverre Vedal; Parveen Bhatti; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Animal production, insecticide use and self-reported symptoms and diagnoses of COPD, including chronic bronchitis, in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Jessica L Rinsky; David B Richardson; Kathleen Kreiss; Leena Nylander-French; Laura E Beane Freeman; Stephanie J London; Paul K Henneberger; Jane A Hoppin
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Estimated time-varying exposures to air emissions from animal feeding operations and childhood asthma.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Zahra Afsharinejad; Paul Sampson; Sverre Vedal; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Maria Tchong-French; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 5.  Respiratory health effects of large animal farming environments.

Authors:  Sara May; Debra J Romberger; Jill A Poole
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Self-reported work activities, eye, nose, and throat symptoms, and respiratory health outcomes among an industrial hog operation worker cohort, North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Vanessa R Coffman; Devon J Hall; Nora Pisanic; David C Love; Maya Nadimpalli; Meredith McCormack; Marie Diener-West; Meghan F Davis; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Self-Reported Occupational Injuries and Perceived Occupational Health Problems among Latino Immigrant Swine Confinement Workers in Missouri.

Authors:  Athena K Ramos; Axel Fuentes; Marcela Carvajal-Suarez
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-06-19

8.  Perception of Job-Related Risk, Training, and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) among Latino Immigrant Hog CAFO Workers in Missouri: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Athena K Ramos; Axel Fuentes; Natalia Trinidad
Journal:  Safety (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.