Literature DB >> 20665237

Laboratory evaluation in oocyte cryopreservation suggests retrieved oocytes are comparable whether frozen for medical indications, deferred reproduction or oocyte donation.

Marie Werner1, Andrea Reh, Patty Ann Labella, Nicole Noyes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to compare pre-cryo data from oocyte cryopreservation (OC) cycles performed for malignancy (MED) vs. elective deferment of reproduction (DR) or oocyte donation (OD).
METHODS: all patients were ≤40 y and underwent standard ovarian stimulation and retrieval. Prior to OC, meiotic spindle (MS) and zona pellucida (ZP) retardance was measured using digital polarized light microscopy (DPLM).
RESULTS: of 130 OC cycles, 49 were for MED, 73 for DR, and 8 for OD. Cycles completed for MED had an average of 9 ±1 spindle-positive oocytes with a mean MS retardance of 1.2  ± 02 nm and ZP retardance of 2.1 ± .06 nm, which was clinically comparable to the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: women with malignancy can achieve adequate ovarian response and similar oocyte parameters to those of women undergoing fertility preservation for non-cancer indications. Such information, coupled with the ability to noninvasively study oocyte dynamics, may improve the counseling of cancer patients seeking fertility preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665237      PMCID: PMC2995435          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9455-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  19 in total

1.  Increased birefringence in the meiotic spindle provides a new marker for the onset of activation in living oocytes.

Authors:  L Liu; J R Trimarchi; R Oldenbourg; D L Keefe
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Spindle imaging: a new marker for optimal timing of ICSI?

Authors:  Y Cohen; M Malcov; T Schwartz; N Mey-Raz; A Carmon; T Cohen; J B Lessing; A Amit; F Azem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Polar body morphology and spindle imaging as predictors of oocyte quality.

Authors:  Lucia De Santis; Ilaria Cino; Elisa Rabellotti; Federico Calzi; Paola Persico; Andrea Borini; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Spindle imaging in human oocytes: the impact of the meiotic cell cycle.

Authors:  Markus Montag; Thomas Schimming; Hans van der Ven
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 5.  Polarized light microscopy of spindles.

Authors:  R Oldenbourg
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  Prediction of chromosome misalignment among in vitro matured human oocytes by spindle imaging with the PolScope.

Authors:  Wei Hua Wang; David L Keefe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Oocyte cryopreservation outcomes including pre-cryopreservation and post-thaw meiotic spindle evaluation following slow cooling and vitrification of human oocytes.

Authors:  Nicole Noyes; Jaime Knopman; Patty Labella; Caroline McCaffrey; Melicia Clark-Williams; Jamie Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles.

Authors:  Y Shen; T Stalf; C Mehnert; U Eichenlaub-Ritter; H-R Tinneberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Leslie R Schover; Ann H Partridge; Pasquale Patrizio; W Hamish Wallace; Karen Hagerty; Lindsay N Beck; Lawrence V Brennan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Imaging meiotic spindles by polarization light microscopy: principles and applications to IVF.

Authors:  David Keefe; Lin Liu; Wei Wang; Celso Silva
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.828

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation.

Authors:  Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years.

Authors:  Andrea E Reh; Lucy Lu; Rachel Weinerman; James Grifo; Lewis Krey; Nicole Noyes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Experiences in fertility preservation: lessons learned to ensure that fertility and reproductive autonomy remain options for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nicole Noyes; Katherine Melzer; Sarah Druckenmiller; M Elizabeth Fino; Meghan Smith; Jaime M Knopman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Concomitant tamoxifen or letrozole for optimal oocyte yield during fertility preservation for breast cancer: the TAmoxifen or Letrozole in Estrogen Sensitive tumors (TALES) randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joseph Letourneau; Flor Juarez-Hernandez; Kaitlyn Wald; Salustiano Ribeiro; Ange Wang; Charles E McCulloch; Evelyn Mok-Lin; Milana Dolezal; A Jo Chien; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell Rosen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.