Literature DB >> 20664364

Comparison of muscle-activation patterns during the conventional push-up and perfect· pushup™ exercises.

James W Youdas1, Brian D Budach, Jay V Ellerbusch, Craig M Stucky, Kevin R Wait, John H Hollman.   

Abstract

Manufacturers of Perfect·Pushup™ handgrips claim enhanced muscular recruitment when compared with the conventional hand-on-floor push-up exercise. Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded using surface electrodes from the right-sided triceps brachii, pectoralis major, serratus anterior (SA), and posterior deltoid muscles during push-ups performed from 3 different hand positions: (a) shoulder width, (b) wide base, and (c) narrow base (NB). Push-ups were performed under 2 conditions: (a) standard push-up and (b) Perfect·Pushup™ handgrips. We recruited 20 healthy subjects, 11 men (24.9 ± 2.6 years) and 9 women (23.8 ± 1 years). Subjects completed 3 consecutive push-ups for each hand position under both conditions. Push-up speed was controlled using a metronome, and testing order was randomized. We recorded peak EMG activity for each muscle during each of the push-ups and normalized EMG values by maximum muscle contractions (% maximum voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]). Electromyographic data were analyzed with 3 (hand position) × 2 (condition) repeated-measures analysis of variance with a post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted simple effects test to detect significant position effects for position by condition interactions (α = 0.05). A push-up required considerable muscle activation of the triceps brachii (73-109% MVIC), pectoralis major (95-105% MVIC), SA (67-87% MVIC), and posterior deltoid (11-21% MVIC) whether performed using the conventional hand-on-floor position or the Perfect·Pushup™ handgrips. The NB hand position was most effective for preferentially activating the triceps brachii and posterior deltoid muscles. Based upon EMG activation from 4 muscles, the Perfect·Pushup™ handgrips do not appear to preferentially enhance muscular recruitment when compared with the conventional push-up method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664364     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc23b0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  Mind-muscle connection training principle: influence of muscle strength and training experience during a pushing movement.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Jonas Vinstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Juan Carlos Colado; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Selective Activation of Shoulder, Trunk, and Arm Muscles: A Comparative Analysis of Different Push-Up Variants.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marcolin; Nicola Petrone; Tatiana Moro; Giuseppe Battaglia; Antonino Bianco; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Muscle Activation during Push-Ups with Different Suspension Training Systems.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Sebastien Borreani; Juan C Colado; Fernando F Martín; Michael E Rogers; David G Behm; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Comparison of the shake weight(®) modality exercises when compared to traditional dumbbells.

Authors:  Jordan M Glenn; Isaac Cook; Ro Di Brezzo; Michelle Gray; Jennifer L Vincenzo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The sit up test to exhaustion as a test for muscular endurance evaluation.

Authors:  Antonino Bianco; Corrado Lupo; Marianna Alesi; Serena Spina; Margherita Raccuglia; Ewan Thomas; Antonio Paoli; Antonio Palma
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Muscular activities during sling- and ground-based push-up exercise.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Tatsuya Chou; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-03-28

7.  The effects of exercise type and elbow angle on vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity during a push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jun G San Juan; David N Suprak; Sean M Roach; Marc Lyda
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Hormonal and neuromuscular responses to mechanical vibration applied to upper extremity muscles.

Authors:  Riccardo Di Giminiani; Leila Fabiani; Giuliano Baldini; Giovanni Cardelli; Aldo Giovannelli; Jozsef Tihanyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation and comparison of electromyographic activity in bench press with feet on the ground and active hip flexion.

Authors:  José M Muyor; David Rodríguez-Ridao; Isabel Martín-Fuentes; José A Antequera-Vique
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electromyographic comparison of traditional and suspension push-ups.

Authors:  Ronald L Snarr; Michael R Esco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.