Literature DB >> 20664157

Evaluation of the cerebrovascular pressure reactivity index using non-invasive finapres arterial blood pressure.

M Kasprowicz1, E Schmidt, D J Kim, C Haubrich, Z Czosnyka, P Smielewski, M Czosnyka.   

Abstract

A pressure reactivity index (PRx) can be assessed in patients with continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) as a moving correlation coefficient between slow fluctuations of these two signals within a low frequency bandwidth. The study aimed to investigate whether the invasive ABP monitoring can be replaced with non-invasive measurement of ABP using a Finapres plethysmograph (fABP) to calculate the fPRx. There is a well-defined group of patients, suffering from hydrocephalus and undergoing CSF pressure monitoring, which may benefit from such a measurement. 41 simultaneous day-by-day monitoring of ICP, ABP and fABP were performed for about 30 min in 10 head injury patients. A Bland-Altman assessment for agreement was used to compare PRx and fPRx calculations. Performance metrics and the McNemary test were used to determine whether fPRx is sensitive enough to distinguish between functioning and disturbed cerebrovascular pressure reactivity. The fPRx correlated with PRx (R(Spearman) = 0.92, p < 0.001; bias = -0.04; lower and upper limits of agreement: -0.26 and 0.17, respectively). The fPRx distinguished between active and passive reactivity in more than 89% cases. The fPRx can be used with care for assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients for whom invasive ABP measurement is not feasible. The fPRx is sensitive enough to distinguish between functional and deranged reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664157     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  4 in total

1.  Continuous cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring and autoregulation monitoring identify similar lower limits of autoregulation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R Blaine Easley; Kathleen K Kibler; Kenneth M Brady; Brijen Joshi; Masahiro Ono; Charles Brown; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  The Role of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Diagnosis and Shunt Prognostication.

Authors:  Afroditi D Lalou; Shadnaz Asgari; Marek Czosnyka; Eva Nabbanja; Matthew Garnett; Zofia H Czosnyka
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

3.  Beyond HRV: attractor reconstruction using the entire cardiovascular waveform data for novel feature extraction.

Authors:  Philip J Aston; Mark I Christie; Ying H Huang; Manasi Nandi
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 4.  Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas Canac; Kian Jalaleddini; Samuel G Thorpe; Corey M Thibeault; Robert B Hamilton
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.