PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the effect of submaximal inspiration on computed tomographic (CT) indexes used to quantify emphysema and to discriminate between effects of lung tissue loss and increase in total lung capacity (TLC) on these indexes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ethical committee-approved study, 20 control subjects and 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who provided written informed consent were included. Three 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from each participant at 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, and 50% of vital capacity (VC). At each volume, eight percentiles of attenuation distribution, as well as relative area (RA) of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than nine thresholds, were calculated. A linear regression line between TLC and each CT index was plotted for control subjects. Mean distance from data points measured in patients with COPD to the normal regression line was used to reflect the effect of lung tissue loss, regardless of TLC. RESULTS: The RA of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than -950 HU (RA(950)) at any percentage of VC lower than 100% decreased significantly from that at 100% VC (P ≤ .002) in control subjects and patients with COPD; however, between 100% VC and 90% VC, the average difference in RA(950) was only 3% and 2% in control subjects and patients with COPD, respectively. The 1st percentile at any percentage of VC lower than 100% increased from that at 100% VC (P < .001) in control subjects. This percentile did not significantly differ from 100% VC at 90% VC or 80% VC (P = .176 and P = 0.077, respectively), but it did significantly differ from 100% VC at 70% VC and 50% VC (P ≤ .002 for both) in patients with COPD. Slope and mean distance were different from zero for all RAs and percentiles except for mean distance for RAs between RA(900) and RA(920). CONCLUSION: Submaximal inspiration induces underestimation of pulmonary emphysema. Both lung tissue loss and TLC influence CT indexes, suggesting the need to establish normal CT values.
PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the effect of submaximal inspiration on computed tomographic (CT) indexes used to quantify emphysema and to discriminate between effects of lung tissue loss and increase in total lung capacity (TLC) on these indexes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ethical committee-approved study, 20 control subjects and 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who provided written informed consent were included. Three 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from each participant at 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, and 50% of vital capacity (VC). At each volume, eight percentiles of attenuation distribution, as well as relative area (RA) of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than nine thresholds, were calculated. A linear regression line between TLC and each CT index was plotted for control subjects. Mean distance from data points measured in patients with COPD to the normal regression line was used to reflect the effect of lung tissue loss, regardless of TLC. RESULTS: The RA of lung occupied by attenuation coefficients lower than -950 HU (RA(950)) at any percentage of VC lower than 100% decreased significantly from that at 100% VC (P ≤ .002) in control subjects and patients with COPD; however, between 100% VC and 90% VC, the average difference in RA(950) was only 3% and 2% in control subjects and patients with COPD, respectively. The 1st percentile at any percentage of VC lower than 100% increased from that at 100% VC (P < .001) in control subjects. This percentile did not significantly differ from 100% VC at 90% VC or 80% VC (P = .176 and P = 0.077, respectively), but it did significantly differ from 100% VC at 70% VC and 50% VC (P ≤ .002 for both) in patients with COPD. Slope and mean distance were different from zero for all RAs and percentiles except for mean distance for RAs between RA(900) and RA(920). CONCLUSION: Submaximal inspiration induces underestimation of pulmonary emphysema. Both lung tissue loss and TLC influence CT indexes, suggesting the need to establish normal CT values.
Authors: Miranda Kirby; Charles Hatt; Nancy Obuchowski; Stephen M Humphries; Jered Sieren; David A Lynch; Sean B Fain Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Cynthia Gordon; Kirana Gudi; Anja Krause; Rachel Sackrowitz; Ben-Gary Harvey; Yael Strulovici-Barel; Jason G Mezey; Ronald G Crystal Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Bertram J Jobst; Oliver Weinheimer; Mila Trauth; Nikolaus Becker; Erna Motsch; Marie-Luise Groß; Jan Tremper; Stefan Delorme; Anke Eigentopf; Monika Eichinger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Mark O Wielpütz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 5.315