Literature DB >> 20663701

Risk communication and shared decision making in the care of patients with osteoporosis.

E Michael Lewiecki1.   

Abstract

Health maintenance and disease management require vigilance in assessing risk, communicating risk, and balancing the expected benefits of therapeutic interventions with potential harms. The evaluation of skeletal health includes identification of clinical risk factors for fracture, bone density testing in appropriate patients, and the use of validated algorithms for estimating the probability of fracture. To reduce the burden of osteoporotic fractures, patients at risk for fracture must be identified and treated with effective agents that are taken regularly, correctly, and for a sufficient length of time to achieve the desired benefit. These goals may be enhanced by shared decision making, a process by which the clinician and the patient share all applicable information and negotiate a plan of treatment that is acceptable to both. As an educator and a partner in making treatment decisions, the clinician must be familiar with the medical evidence and able to discuss complex medical information in a manner that is understood by the patient, with appropriate consideration of the patient's expectations, beliefs, and concerns. After treatment is started, risk communication, patient education, and shared decision making should be continued in an effort to maintain good compliance and persistence with therapy. Further study is needed to identify and validate optimal risk communication tools for the care of patients with osteoporosis. Challenges to shared decision making include competition from other health care priorities for limited patient encounter time during office visits, poor reimbursement, insufficient knowledge of the medical evidence, inadequate communication skills, and cognitive/affective disorders limiting patient participation in making treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2010 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663701     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  13 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; William D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Provider use of collaborative goal setting with glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Betsy Sleath; Catherine Slota; Susan J Blalock; Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Kelly W Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Alan L Robin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  What information can the lay public find about osteoporosis treatment? A descriptive study coding the content and quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet.

Authors:  L N Fuzzell; M J Richards; L Fraenkel; S L Stark; M C Politi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Osteoporosis, frailty and fracture: implications for case finding and therapy.

Authors:  Joop P van den Bergh; Tineke A van Geel; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 6.  Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The role of risk communication in the care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Applying the resources and supports in self-management framework to examine ophthalmologist-patient communication and glaucoma medication adherence.

Authors:  B Sleath; D M Carpenter; S J Blalock; R Sayner; K W Muir; C Slota; A L Giangiacomo; M E Hartnett; G Tudor; A L Robin
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-09-02

9.  The impact of bone mineral density testing, fracture assessment, and osteoporosis education in men treated by androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Nadler; Shabbir Alibhai; Pamela Catton; Charles Catton; Jennifer Jones
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Communication in production animal medicine: modelling a complex interaction with the example of dairy herd health medicine.

Authors:  Joachim L Kleen; Owen Atkinson; Jos Ptm Noordhuizen
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.