Literature DB >> 20663670

Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST2 system.

M Maetzler1, T Bochdansky, R J Abboud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the repeatability of the Emed® ST2 system and identify the range of pressure values observed in the normal foot.
METHODS: Measurements were taken from twenty-three healthy subjects, 14 females and 9 males, on two occasions 7 days apart. Begin of contact (BC), end of contact (EC), contact time (CT), peak pressure (PP), instant of peak pressure (IPP), contact area (CA) and pressure-time integral (PTI) were recorded.
RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was less than 16.0% for all 63 parameters considered. In 87.3% of the parameters investigated (55 of 63) the CR (expressed as a percentage of the mean) was less than 10%. The highest areas of PP were found under the great toe and second metatarsal heads, with mean (S.D.) equal to 435 kPa (202) and 407 kPa (146), respectively, followed by the third metatarsal head 345 kPa (96) and the hindfoot 332 kPa (93). The CT (% ROP (range of pressure)) was in the range 74-85% under the metatarsal heads, and 71% under the great toe. CA was highest under the heel at 33.8 cm(2).
CONCLUSION: Emed® ST2 system was found to be repeatable. The presented range of parameters compared very well to the results presented in the literature for the Emed® ST4 system.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663670     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  7 in total

1.  Pathophysiological Behaviour of the Climber's Foot versus the General Population: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Paula Cobos-Moreno; Álvaro Astasio-Picado; Beatriz Gómez-Martín
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Correlation of foot posture index with plantar pressure and radiographic measurements in pediatric flatfoot.

Authors:  Jung Su Lee; Ki Beom Kim; Jin Ook Jeong; Na Yeon Kwon; Sang Mi Jeong
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-02-28

3.  Dynamic 3D shape of the plantar surface of the foot using coded structured light: a technical report.

Authors:  Ali K Thabet; Emanuele Trucco; Joaquim Salvi; Weijie Wang; Rami J Abboud
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Reliability of the Footscan® Platform System in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of without Top-Layer and with Top-Layer Protocols.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Xin-Xin Wen; Lu-Yu Huang; Lei Shang; Zhao Yang; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Assessment of Long-Term Badminton Experience on Foot Posture Index and Plantar Pressure Distribution.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Minjun Liang; Feng Ren
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Standard reference values of weight and maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years in Germany.

Authors:  D Ohlendorf; K Kerth; W Osiander; F Holzgreve; L Fraeulin; H Ackermann; D A Groneberg
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan® platform system.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Xin-Xin Wen; Lu-Yu Huang; Lei Shang; Xi-Xia Cheng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.