Literature DB >> 20663494

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (Part 1). Post-surgical complications in 204 cases in a reference hospital].

Juli Busquets1, Juan Fabregat, Rosa Jorba, Núria Peláez, Francisco García-Borobia, Cristina Masuet, Carlos Valls, Laura Martínez-Carnicero, Laura Lladó, Jaume Torras.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP) is the treatment of choice in cancer of the head of the pancreas. However, it continues to have a high post-surgical morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to define variables that influence post-surgical morbidity and mortality after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) cancer of the head of the pancreas (CHP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The variables were prospectively collected form patients operated on between 1991 and 2007, in order to investigate the factors of higher morbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients had been intervened due to PA, of whom 57 were older than 70 years. Of these patients, 119 had a CPD, 11 extended lymphadenectomy, 66 with pyloric conservation, and 8 with extension to total pancreatectomy due to involvement of the section margin. Portal or mesenteric vein resection was included in 35 cases. Post-surgical complications were detected in 45% of cases, the most frequent being: slow gastric emptying (20%), surgical wound infection (17%), pancreatic fistula (10%), and serious medical complications (8%). Further surgery was required in 13%, and the over post-surgical mortality was 7%. A patient age greater than 70 years, post-surgical haemoperitoneum, gastroenteric dehiscence, and the presence of medical complications were post-surgical mortality risk factors in the multivariate analysis. Pancreatic fistula was not a factor associated with post-surgical mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is a safe technique but with a considerable morbidity. Patients over 70 years of age must be carefully selected before considering surgery. Serious medical complications must be treated aggressively to avoid an unfavourable progression.
Copyright © 2010 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663494     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging assessment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: reconstruction techniques-normal findings and complications.

Authors:  Lautaro Manuel Florentin; Gonzalo Dulcich; Roy López Grove; José Ignacio Paladini; Juan Carlos Spina
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-10-20

2.  EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors and oligometastatic disease: an observational prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira; Rodrigo Garces-Duran; Pierre Eisendrath; Jacques Devière; Pierre Deprez; Laurent Monino; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Ivan Borbath
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

3.  Delayed gastric emptying after classical Whipple or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized clinical trial (QUANUPAD).

Authors:  J Busquets; S Martín; Ll Secanella; M Sorribas; N Cornellà; J Altet; N Peláez; M Bajen; T Carnaval; S Videla; J Fabregat
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Vascularisation pattern of chronic pancreatitis compared with pancreatic carcinoma: results from contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael Hocke; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2012-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.