Literature DB >> 20663455

Patient perceptions of different lancing sites for self-monitoring of blood glucose: a comparison of fingertip site with palm site using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System.

Takao Ito1, Kyuzi Kamoi, Shinichi Minagawa, Keita Kimura, Akane Kobayashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alternate-site testing (AST) for self-monitoring of blood glucose leads to improved glycemic control for treatment of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study was to compare the comfort of two different lancing sites, fingertip and palm sites, for AST in diabetes patients.
METHODS: Patients injected insulin four times a day. Self-monitoring of blood glucose was carried out more than thrice daily with fingertip measurements for at least three months using apparatuses except the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System (OneTouch) before examination. The comfort of two lancing sites using OneTouch were compared. In two randomized groups that used one fingertip lancing site for one week followed by the alternate lancing site for another week, patients completed 11-item questionnaires assessing usability of the site before and after each week. Each item was scored on a visual analogue scale from -100 (most negative) to +100 (most positive).
RESULTS: Most patients desired to continue AST, which was insignificantly different between the two lancing sites (fingertip and palm AST) in 43 diabetes patients aged 57.3 +/- 13.8 years, body mass index of 23.1 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2), diabetes duration of 19.6 +/- 9.7 years, and hemoglobin A1c of 7.4 +/- 1.1%. However, patients were less (p < .01) satisfied with using the palm lancing site as compared to the fingertip lancing site because of difficulties in inserting the needle, drawing blood samples, and applying enough blood into the test strip.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that patients desire to use the palm for AST, but more technological advances in AST of a palm site is required to reduce patient discomfort. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663455      PMCID: PMC2909523          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  7 in total

1.  Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites.

Authors:  John M Ellison; Janet M Stegmann; Sandra L Colner; Ragui H Michael; Manoj K Sharma; Kenneth R Ervin; David L Horwitz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Glucose monitoring at the arm: risky delays of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection.

Authors:  Karsten Jungheim; Theodor Koschinsky
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing.

Authors:  Dawn M Bina; Robyn L Anderson; Mary L Johnson; Richard M Bergenstal; David M Kendall
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Debra M Lee; Sandra E Weinert; Earl E Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites.

Authors:  Nina Peled; Daniel Wong; Shilpa L Gwalani
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Kirsten C Kempe; David Budd; Marc Stern; John M Ellison; Linda A Saari; Carol A Adiletto; Bryan Olin; David A Price; David L Horwitz
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Patient perceptions of injection pain and anxiety: a comparison of NovoFine 32-gauge tip 6mm and Micro Fine Plus 31-gauge 5mm needles.

Authors:  Midori Iwanaga; Kyuzi Kamoi
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Determination of ubiquinone in blood by high-performance liquid chromatography with post-column fluorescence derivatization using 2-cyanoacetamide.

Authors:  Yukio Nohara; Junko Suzuki; Hiroaki Kubo
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 2.  Lancing: quo vadis?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Dirk Boecker
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Clinical Evaluation of a New, Lower Pain, One Touch Lancing Device for People With Diabetes: Virtually Pain-Free Testing and Improved Comfort Compared to Current Lancing Systems.

Authors:  Mike Grady; Greg Lamps; Ashley Shemain; Hilary Cameron; Linda Murray
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-17

4.  An analysis of alternate site tests to improve patient compliance with self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Jeanne M Jacoby
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 5.  Influences on Technology Use and Efficacy in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Victoria Franklin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.