Literature DB >> 20663262

DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review.

Yves Ménézo1, Brian Dale, Marc Cohen.   

Abstract

The genome of all cells is protected at all times by mechanisms collectively known as DNA repair activity (DRA). Such activity is particularly important at the beginning of human life, i.e. at fertilization, immediately after and at the very onset of embryonic development. DRA in early development is, by definition, of maternal origin: the transcripts stored during maturation, need to control the integrity of chromatin, at least until the maternal/zygotic transition at the 4- to 8-cell stage in the human embryo. Tolerance towards DNA damage must be low during this critical stage of development. The majority of DNA damage is due to either apoptosis or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Apoptosis, abortive or not, is a common feature in human sperm, especially in oligoasthenospermic patients and FAS ligand has been reported on the surface of human spermatozoa. The susceptibility of human sperm to DNA damage is well documented, particularly the negative effect of ROS (Kodama et al., 1997; Lopes et al., 1998a, b) and DNA modifying agents (Zenzes et al., 1999; Badouard et al., 2007). DNA damage in sperm is one of the major causes of male infertility and is of much concern in relation to the paternal transmission of mutations and cancer (Zenzes, 2000; Aitken et al., 2003; Fernández-Gonzalez, 2008). It is now clear that DNA damaged spermatozoa are able to reach the fertilization site in vivo (Zenzes et al., 1999), fertilize oocytes and generate early embryos both in vivo and in vitro. The effect of ROS on human oocytes is not as easy to study or quantify. It is a common consensus that the maternal genome is relatively well protected while in the maturing follicle; however damage may occur during the long quiescent period before meiotic re-activation (Zenzes et al., 1998). In fact, during the final stages of follicular growth, the oocyte may be susceptible to damage by ROS. With regards to the embryo there is active protection against ROS in the surrounding environment i.e. in follicular and tubal fluid (El Mouatassim et al., 2000; Guerin et al., 2001). DNA repair activity in the zygote is mandatory in order to avoid mutation in the germ line (Derijck et al., 2008). In this review we focus on the expression of mRNAs that regulate DNA repair capacity in the human oocyte and the mechanisms that protect the embryo against de novo damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663262     DOI: 10.1017/S0967199410000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zygote        ISSN: 0967-1994            Impact factor:   1.442


  68 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and clinical correlates of sperm DNA damage.

Authors:  Lara Tamburrino; Sara Marchiani; Margarita Montoya; Francesco Elia Marino; Ilaria Natali; Marta Cambi; Gianni Forti; Elisabetta Baldi; Monica Muratori
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Sperm cryopreservation reduces offspring growth.

Authors:  David Nusbaumer; Lucas Marques da Cunha; Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The problem with being choosy when it comes to sperm selection.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  DNA fragmentation in concert with the simultaneous assessment of cell viability in a subfertile population: establishing thresholds of normality both before and after density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  U Punjabi; H Van Mulders; I Goovaerts; K Peeters; E Roelant; D De Neubourg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  New insights into human pre-implantation metabolism in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Yves Ménézo; Isabelle Lichtblau; Kay Elder
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Rakesh K Sharma; Jaime Gosálvez; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Magnetic-activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa improves the quality of embryos according to female age: a prospective sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Martin Stimpfel; Ivan Verdenik; Branko Zorn; Irma Virant-Klun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ultrastructural and cytogenetic analyses of mature human oocyte dysmorphisms with respect to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mário Sousa; Mariana Cunha; Joaquina Silva; Elsa Oliveira; Maria João Pinho; Carolina Almeida; Rosália Sá; José Teixeira da Silva; Cristiano Oliveira; Alberto Barros
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Environmental pollutants: genetic damage and epigenetic changes in male germ cells.

Authors:  Cecilia Vecoli; Luigi Montano; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Double-stranded DNA breaks hidden in the neutral Comet assay suggest a role of the sperm nuclear matrix in DNA integrity maintenance.

Authors:  J Ribas-Maynou; J E Gawecka; J Benet; W S Ward
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.