Literature DB >> 20662959

Comparative ingestive mastication in domestic horses and cattle: a pilot investigation.

C M Janis1, E C Constable, K A Houpt, W J Streich, M Clauss.   

Abstract

It is often assumed that horses chew food more intensively during ingestion than cattle, which - as ruminants - complete part of the mastication during rumination. This has been proposed as a reason for more robust mandibles, larger masseter insertion areas and larger masseter muscles in horses as compared to cattle and other grazing ruminants. In this study, we evaluate results of comparative feeding trials with three horses (338-629 kg) and three cows (404-786 kg), on four different roughages. Ingestion time (s/g dry matter) and chewing intensity (chews/g dry matter) differed among animals within a species, indicating an influence of body mass, and differed significantly between different forages. However, although numerical differences clearly suggest that horses have longer ingestion times and higher chewing intensities on high-fibre roughage than do cattle, this could not be proven in this dataset, most likely because of the small number of individuals sampled. Further studies are required to corroborate the suspected ingestive behaviour difference between equids and ruminants.
© 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20662959     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)        ISSN: 0931-2439            Impact factor:   2.130


  4 in total

1.  Mechanical modelling of tooth wear.

Authors:  Aleksis Karme; Janina Rannikko; Aki Kallonen; Marcus Clauss; Mikael Fortelius
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Snout shape in extant ruminants.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Norman MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Chewed out: an experimental link between food material properties and repetitive loading of the masticatory apparatus in mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Ravosa; Jeremiah E Scott; Kevin R McAbee; Anna J Veit; Annika L Fling
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A Computerized Simulation of the Occlusal Surface in Equine Cheek Teeth: A Simplified Model.

Authors:  Tomas Sterkenburgh; Ellen Schulz-Kornas; Michael Nowak; Carsten Staszyk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.