Literature DB >> 20662877

A comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at 3 and 80 pulses per second on cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants.

Chih-Chung Chen1, Mark I Johnson.   

Abstract

Electrophysiological studies suggest that there are differential frequency effects during TENS. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the effects of strong non-painful TENS administered at 3 pulses per second (pps) and 80 pps on cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants. A repeated measure design was used with participants receiving TENS at 3 pps and 80 pps in the same experiment. There were six cold-pressor pain tests conducted on the hand with each type of TENS delivered via four electrodes on the ipsilateral forearm for 20 min. Outcomes were differences in pain threshold (s) and intensity (VAS) after 5 and 15 min of TENS. A 2 x 3 factorial repeated measure ANOVA was performed on data. Thirty-five participants completed the experiment. Statistically significant effects were detected for condition, time and interactions between time x condition for both threshold and intensity. There were statistically higher pain thresholds and lower pain intensities for 3 pps when compared to 80 pps after 5 and 15 min of TENS. The differences after 15 min of TENS were 1.70 s to 3.70 s (95% CI) for threshold and 6.63-15.5 mm (95% CI) for pain intensity. In conclusion, strong non-painful TENS at 3 pps was superior to 80 pps at reducing experimentally induced cold-pressor pain. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20662877     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00936.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on tissue repair: A literature review.

Authors:  Aline Fernanda Perez Machado; Eduardo Ferreira Santana; Pascale Mutti Tacani; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation and Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Sara Ud-Din; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-27

4.  The antalgic effects of non-invasive physical modalities on central post-stroke pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Chen; Yu-Fen Chuang; Andrew Chih-Wei Huang; Chih-Kuang Chen; Ya-Ju Chang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Kayla Bergeron-Vézina; Hélène Corriveau; Marylie Martel; Marie-Philippe Harvey; Guillaume Léonard
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  Single and double pain responses to individually titrated ultra-short laser stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Anna Sellgren Engskov; Agneta Troilius Rubin; Jonas Åkeson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.