Literature DB >> 20662673

Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.

Neophytos Demetriades1, Jong Il Park, Constantinos Laskarides.   

Abstract

This clinical review is an evaluation of the effectiveness of the split ridge bone augmentation technique performed in the atrophic maxilla and mandible with buccolingual bony defects. The osseointegration success of implant placement in the area of split ridge bone augmentation is assessed and compared to implant success rates indicated in the literature. This evaluation includes 15 patients who were treated with alveolar split ridge bone augmentation at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. During initial consultation, all patients were diagnosed with a buccolingual bone dimension of 3-5 mm on the edentulous alveolar crest. This bony buccolingual dimension was inadequate for placement of implants of desirable width and correct angulation as dictated by the prosthetic requirements. Crestal split augmentation technique involved a surgical osteotomy that was followed by alveolar crest split and augmentation after buccolingual bony plate expansion, prior to implantation. Implants were placed either immediately or 3 weeks after the initial augmentation. No fixation was used to stabilize the buccal bony cortex after the completion of the augmentation. All patients were placed on periodic follow-ups for a 24-month period postoperatively. Implant success was determined with the use of Buser's Criteria. In total, 33 implants were placed in 15 patients. The overall success rate of osseointegration of the endosseous implants placed in the area of split ridge bone augmentation was found to be 97%. One patient presented with facial bone resorption and implant mobility 4 months after the surgery. The implant was removed and the area was reconstructed with autogenous bone graft and later implanted with an endosseous implant. Our results indicate that the split crest bone augmentation technique is a valid reconstructive procedure that can be used to augment the buccolingual alveolar defect prior to implant placement providing good bone foundation for placement of implants with desirable width in favorable angulation. In comparison to traditional bone grafts techniques, crestal split ridge bone augmentation enables placement of dental implants immediately or 3 weeks after augmentation and eradicates the possible morbidity of the donor sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20662673     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  The Comparison of Utilizing Piezotome and Surgical Disc in Ridge Splitting of Atrophic Edentulous Maxillary Ridge.

Authors:  Reza Shahakbari; Majid Eshghpour; Vajiheh Mianbandi; Solmaz Pourgonabadi; Elahe Tohidi; Seyed Jalal Seyedi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-06-05

Review 2.  Bone manipulation procedures in dental implants.

Authors:  Yuvika Mittal; Govind Jindal; Sandeep Garg
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nayansi Jha; Eun Ha Choi; Nagendra Kumar Kaushik; Jae Jun Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Alveolar Ridge Split Technique Using Piezosurgery with Specially Designed Tips.

Authors:  Alessandro Moro; Giulio Gasparini; Enrico Foresta; Gianmarco Saponaro; Marco Falchi; Lorenzo Cardarelli; Paolo De Angelis; Mario Forcione; Umberto Garagiola; Giuseppe D'Amato; Sandro Pelo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi; Vahid Reza Hosseini
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-09

Review 6.  Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Jonas Peter Becktor
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-12-30

7.  A Modified Ridge Splitting Technique Using Autogenous Bone Blocks-A Case Series.

Authors:  Dorottya Pénzes; Fanni Simon; Eitan Mijiritsky; Orsolya Németh; Márton Kivovics
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.