Literature DB >> 2066212

Comparison of French and English versions of the American Thoracic Society respiratory questionnaire in a bilingual working population.

J W Osterman1, B G Armstrong, E Ledoux, M Sloan, P Ernst.   

Abstract

Standardized French and English versions of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) respiratory disease questionnaire were administered to 204 English-speaking and 406 French-speaking male blue-collar aviation workers unexposed to occupational respiratory hazards. After adjusting for smoking status, age, years of education, foreign birth and maternal language other than French or English, no significant differences between the two questionnaires were found for response rates to usual cough, usual phlegm, mild or moderate dyspnoea, and chronic bronchitis. French-speaking workers reported significantly less wheeze with colds (OR = 0.60, p less than 0.02) and wheeze apart from colds (OR = 0.55, p less than 0.05) than the English-speaking group, but, the occurrence of wheeze on most days or nights was similar for both groups (OR = 1.02, NS). For 66 bilingual workers who completed both French and English questionnaires at a time interval of approximately two months, highly consistent results were found for sociodemographic data, smoking habits, cough, phlegm, breathlessness and chronic bronchitis, but not for wheeze with or apart from colds (agreement less than 90%; Kappa less than 0.50). These results reflect the difficulties in translating the concept of 'wheeze' from English to French. We conclude that most symptoms elicited by the French questionnaire may be generalized to English-speaking populations, but that questions pertaining to wheeze on most days or nights may be preferable to other questions concerning wheeze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066212     DOI: 10.1093/ije/20.1.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  6 in total

1.  Work-related asthma in Montreal, Quebec: population attributable risk in a community-based study.

Authors:  Ahmet Demir; Lawrence Joseph; Margaret R Becklake
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Randomised controlled trial of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J Bourbeau; M Y Rouleau; S Boucher
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Prevalence of asthma symptoms among adults aged 20-44 years in Canada.

Authors:  J Manfreda; M R Becklake; M R Sears; M Chan-Yeung; H Dimich-Ward; H C Siersted; P Ernst; L Sweet; L Van Til; D M Bowie; N R Anthonisen; R B Tate
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Socioeconomic risk factors for asthma in Chilean young adults.

Authors:  Camila Corvalán; Hugo Amigo; Patricia Bustos; Roberto J Rona
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Physiological and perceived health effects from daily changes in air pollution and weather among persons with heart failure: a panel study.

Authors:  Mark S Goldberg; Amanda J Wheeler; Richard T Burnett; Nancy E Mayo; Marie-France Valois; James M Brophy; Nadia Giannetti
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 6.  Systematic review of worldwide variations of the prevalence of wheezing symptoms in children.

Authors:  Swatee P Patel; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Mark P Little
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.