Literature DB >> 20661891

Women's experience of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a qualitative study.

J C Karatas1, K Barlow-Stewart, K A Strong, B Meiser, C McMahon, C Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an in-depth account of the experience of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
METHOD: Exploratory qualitative interview study. Participants were recruited from one major in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic in Sydney, Australia. Data were collected through 14 in-depth interviews with women at different stages of PGD, utilized a thematic approach and facilitated by NVivo software.
RESULTS: Women reported using PGD as empowering and led them to feel in control of their reproductive futures. Health professionals who did not tell women about PGD were seen as a barrier to accessing treatment. The ability to select embryos free from the genetic condition (for which it was at risk) alleviated stress. Despite this, stress experienced with PGD was significant for women, and often related to past experiences of reproductive trauma and grief. The outcome of embryos was also the cause of stress for women.
CONCLUSION: Women undergoing PGD have a diverse range of reproductive and genetic histories, psychosocial circumstances and world views that all interact and impact their experience of PGD. Successful support and care of these women should address all of these factors and tailor the support provided for women using this physically and emotionally complex form of reproductive technology. (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661891     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  9 in total

1.  The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Karen Kavanaugh; Ellen Olshansky; Alan Schwartz; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation.

Authors:  K Haude; P McCarthy Veach; B LeRoy; H Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  More than 10 years after the first 'savior siblings': parental experiences surrounding preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Margaret L MacMillan; John E Wagner; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M).

Authors:  J Zhang; L R Rubin; H Zierhut; L M Pastore
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Joep Geraedts; Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Wybo Dondorp; Luca Gianaroli; Gary Harton; Tanya Milachich; Helena Kääriäinen; Inge Liebaers; Michael Morris; Jorge Sequeiros; Karen Sermon; Françoise Shenfield; Heather Skirton; Sirpa Soini; Claudia Spits; Anna Veiga; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Stéphane Viville; Guido de Wert; Milan Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  CRISPR, a Crossroads in Genetic Intervention: Pitting the Right to Health against the Right to Disability.

Authors:  Shawna Benston
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2016-02-18

8.  Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  G De Krom; Y Severijns; W L Vlieg; Y H J M Arens; R J T Van Golde; C E M De Die-Smulders; L A D M Van Osch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Specialist physicians' referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?

Authors:  Sarah Capelouto; Melanie Evans; Jennifer Shannon; Katelyn Jetelina; Orhan Bukulmez; Bruce Carr
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.