Literature DB >> 20661792

An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian vegetables industry.

Tek N Maraseni1, Geoff Cockfield, Jerry Maroulis, Guangnan Chen.   

Abstract

Recently, partly due to the increasing carbon consciousness in the electorates and partly due to the imminent introduction of the Australian Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS), estimating carbon footprints is becoming increasingly necessary in agriculture. By taking data from several sources, this study estimates the national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a variety of farm inputs, for the 23 key vegetables crops grown in Australia. For the 121,122 ha of land occupied by vegetable farms, there are 1.1 MtCO(2)e GHG emissions or 9.2 tCO(2)e ha(-1). In total, 65% of total GHG emissions from the vegetable industry are due to electricity use for irrigation and post-harvest on-farm activities, 17% from soil N(2)O emissions due to N fertiliser use, 10% from agrochemicals, 7% through fossils fuels and 1% from on-farm machinery. The top four vegetables (by area), potatoes, lettuce, tomatoes and broccoli account for 29.1%, 7.9%, 5.9% and 7.2% of total GHG emissions from vegetables, respectively. However, the ratio of GHG emissions between the highest and lowest-emitting crops per hectare and per tonne, are different. Therefore, care must be exercised in carbon footprint labelling vegetable products to ensure that the labels reflect carbon emissions on a per tonnage basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661792     DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2010.493497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B        ISSN: 0360-1234            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

Review 1.  Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian John Reynolds; Jonathan David Buckley; Philip Weinstein; John Boland
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Interannual variation in carbon sequestration depends mainly on the carbon uptake period in two croplands on the North China Plain.

Authors:  Xueyan Bao; Xuefa Wen; Xiaomin Sun; Fenghua Zhao; Yuying Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases.

Authors:  Ellen Trolle; Matilda Nordman; Anne Dahl Lassen; Tracey A Colley; Lisbeth Mogensen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.