Literature DB >> 20661609

Exploring the structure of opioid receptors with homology modeling based on single and multiple templates and subsequent docking: a comparative study.

Indrani Bera1, Aparna Laskar, Nanda Ghoshal.   

Abstract

Opioid receptors are the principal targets for opioids, which have been used as analgesics for centuries. Opioid receptors belong to the rhodopsin family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the absence of crystal structures of opioid receptors, 3D homology models have been reported with bovine rhodopsin as a template, though the sequence homology is low. Recently, it has been reported that use of multiple templates results in a better model for a target having low sequence identity with a single template. With the objective of carrying out a comparative study on the structural quality of the 3D models based on single and multiple templates, the homology models for opioid receptors (mu, delta and kappa) were generated using bovine rhodopsin as single template and the recently deposited crystal structures of squid rhodopsin, turkey β-1 and human β-2 adrenoreceptors along with bovine rhodopsin as multiple templates. In this paper we report the results of comparison between the refined 3D models based on multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and models built with bovine rhodopsin as template, using validation programs PROCHECK, PROSA, Verify 3D, Molprobity and docking studies. The results indicate that homology models of mu and kappa with multiple templates are better than those built with only bovine rhodopsin as template, whereas, in many aspects, the homology model of delta opioid receptor with single template is better with respect to the model based on multiple templates. Three nonselective ligands were docked to both the models of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors using GOLD 3.1. The results of docking complied well with the pharamacophore, reported for nonspecific opioid ligands. The comparison of docking results for models with multiple templates and those with single template have been discussed in detail. Three selective ligands for each receptor were also docked. As the crystallographic structures are not yet known, this comparison will help in choosing better homology models of opioid receptors for studying ligand receptor interactions to design new potent opioid antagonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661609     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-010-0803-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure.

Authors:  James C Whisstock; Arthur M Lesk
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  Homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations of the mu opioid receptor in a membrane-aqueous system.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yuk Y Sham; Ramkumar Rajamani; Jiali Gao; Philip S Portoghese
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling.

Authors:  Konstantin Arnold; Lorenza Bordoli; Jürgen Kopp; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Comparative modeling and molecular dynamics studies of the delta, kappa and mu opioid receptors.

Authors:  D Strahs; H Weinstein
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1997-09

5.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  The molecular basis of opioid receptor function.

Authors:  W F Simonds
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?

Authors:  Juan Carlos Mobarec; Roberto Sanchez; Marta Filizola
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of 14-alkoxymorphinans. 21. Novel 4-alkoxy and 14-phenylpropoxy derivatives of the mu opioid receptor antagonist cyprodime.

Authors:  Mariana Spetea; Falko Schüllner; Radu C Moisa; Ilona P Berzetei-Gurske; Barbara Schraml; Cynthia Dörfler; Mario D Aceto; Louis S Harris; Andrew Coop; Helmut Schmidhammer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21
View more
  8 in total

1.  Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 14-heteroaromatic-substituted naltrexone derivatives: pharmacological profile switch from mu opioid receptor selectivity to mu/kappa opioid receptor dual selectivity.

Authors:  Yunyun Yuan; Saheem A Zaidi; Orgil Elbegdorj; Lindsey C K Aschenbach; Guo Li; David L Stevens; Krista L Scoggins; William L Dewey; Dana E Selley; Yan Zhang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Homology Model Versus X-ray Structure in Receptor-based Drug Design: A Retrospective Analysis with the Dopamine D3 Receptor.

Authors:  Nicolas Levoin; Thierry Calmels; Stéphane Krief; Denis Danvy; Isabelle Berrebi-Bertrand; Jeanne-Marie Lecomte; Jean-Charles Schwartz; Marc Capet
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Molecular dynamics of fentanyl bound to μ-opioid receptor.

Authors:  Piotr F J Lipiński; Małgorzata Jarończyk; Jan Cz Dobrowolski; Joanna Sadlej
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  GPCR-SSFE: a comprehensive database of G-protein-coupled receptor template predictions and homology models.

Authors:  Catherine L Worth; Annika Kreuchwig; Gunnar Kleinau; Gerd Krause
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  GPCRs from fusarium graminearum detection, modeling and virtual screening - the search for new routes to control head blight disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bresso; Roberto Togawa; Kim Hammond-Kosack; Martin Urban; Bernard Maigret; Natalia Florencio Martins
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Towards improved quality of GPCR models by usage of multiple templates and profile-profile comparison.

Authors:  Dorota Latek; Pawel Pasznik; Teresa Carlomagno; Slawomir Filipek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Free fatty acid receptors: structural models and elucidation of ligand binding interactions.

Authors:  Irina G Tikhonova; Elena Poerio
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2015-09-07

8.  Human μ Opioid Receptor Models with Evaluation of the Accuracy Using the Crystal Structure of the Murine μ Opioid Receptor.

Authors:  Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar; Jeffery G Saven; Renyu Liu
Journal:  J Anesth Clin Res       Date:  2012-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.