Literature DB >> 20661197

Tracheal intubation using the mobile C-MAC video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway.

C Byhahn1, T Iber, K Zacharowski, C F Weber, M Ruesseler, R Schalk, D Meininger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that video laryngoscopy enhances the laryngeal view in patients with apparently normal and anticipated difficult airways. The utility of the novel, portable, battery-powered C-MAC video laryngoscope is unproven, but its design makes it potentially useful for emergency situations. We hypothesized that, in patients with a simulated difficult airway created by means of a rigid cervical immobilization collar, the rate of glottic views considered "failed" under direct laryngoscopy could be significantly reduced with the C-MAC video laryngoscope.
METHODS: Following power analysis and ethical approval, 43 adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were studied. First, direct laryngoscopy was performed with the naked eye with and without applying external laryngeal pressure (BURP maneuver). The best-obtained view was graded by the laryngoscopist without looking at the video monitor. A second anesthesiologist, who was blinded to the laryngeal view obtained under direct laryngoscopy, graded the laryngeal view on the video monitor. A difficult airway was then created and the laryngoscopy sequence repeated. Endotracheal intubation was then attempted under video-aided visualization.
RESULTS: In patients with a normal airway, the glottic view was considered as "good" in the vast majority of patients (40-43/43; 93-100%) regardless of the laryngoscopy technique used. When a difficult airway was created, the glottic view was graded as "failed" in 30/43 (70%) and 16/43 (37%) of patients under direct laryngoscopy without and with the BURP maneuver, respectively (P=0.0047). Using video laryngoscopy, significantly fewer laryngoscopic views were graded as "failed" without (14%, P<0.0001) and with the BURP maneuver (5%, P=0.0003) compared to direct laryngoscopy. Endotracheal tube placement was successful in 88% of patients with a difficult airway.
CONCLUSION: The C-MAC video laryngoscope effectively enhanced the laryngeal view in patients with limited inter-incisor distance and eliminated cervical spine clearance. However, endotracheal tube placement failed in 5/43 patients despite a mostly good laryngeal view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  Assessing the efficacy of video versus direct laryngoscopy through retrospective comparison of 436 emergency intubation cases.

Authors:  Benjamen M Jones; Ankit Agrawal; Thomas E Schulte
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Girija Prasad Rath; Hemanshu Prabhakar
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The videoscopic view may not be significantly superior to the directly sighted peroral view during Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopy: a randomized equivalence cadaver trial.

Authors:  Gemma Malpas; George Kovacs; Sean P Mackinnon; Orlando Hung; Sarah Phipps; J Adam Law
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Asad E Patanwala; John C Sakles
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  [Reintubation using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope. Implementation in patients with difficult airways initially managed with in situ laryngeal tubes].

Authors:  R Schalk; C F Weber; C Byhahn; C Reyher; D Stay; K Zacharowski; D Meininger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Airway management disasters in the ICU--lessons learned?

Authors:  Christian Byhahn; Erol Cavus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  SWIVIT--Swiss video-intubation trial evaluating video-laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway scenario: study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in Switzerland.

Authors:  Lorenz Theiler; Kristina Hermann; Patrick Schoettker; Georges Savoldelli; Natalie Urwyler; Maren Kleine-Brueggeney; Kristopher L Arheart; Robert Greif
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 1--difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Natasha Broemling; Richard M Cooper; Pierre Drolet; Laura V Duggan; Donald E Griesdale; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; George Kovacs; Simon Massey; Ian R Morris; Timothy Mullen; Michael F Murphy; Roanne Preston; Viren N Naik; Jeanette Scott; Shean Stacey; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD™ and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways.

Authors:  Haitham Mutlak; Udo Rolle; Willi Rosskopf; Richard Schalk; Kai Zacharowski; Dirk Meininger; Christian Byhahn
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Effect of rigid cervical collar on tracheal intubation using Airtraq(®).

Authors:  Padmaja Durga; Chiranjeevi Yendrapati; Geeta Kaniti; Narmada Padhy; Kiran Kumar Anne; Gopinath Ramachandran
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.