BACKGROUND: Chlamydia screening programs have been shown to reduce the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which can lead to ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. However, few reliable data exist on the population-level burden of PID and the utility of passive case-based surveillance of this important infertility-related outcome. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of all case reports of PID in San Francisco from 2004 to 2009 through our passive case reporting surveillance system. We examined demographics as well as sexually transmitted disease history. Pearson χ and Fisher exact tests were used to assess significance in the trend analysis. RESULTS: There were 245 case reports over the 6-year period examined. There were no statistically significant differences over this period based on demographics. However, an increasing proportion of cases were diagnosed at the municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic. DISCUSSION: PID is an important intermediary to assess the impact in reducing infertility in areas where chlamydia screening programs have been implemented. As the locus of PID care has shifted from inpatient to outpatient settings, passive PID surveillance has not adjusted. Efforts should be made to increase provider awareness that pelvic inflammatory disease is a notifiable condition and improve reporting among providers by devoting resources to either improving current passive surveillance or to the development of new innovative ways to conduct PID surveillance.
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia screening programs have been shown to reduce the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which can lead to ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. However, few reliable data exist on the population-level burden of PID and the utility of passive case-based surveillance of this important infertility-related outcome. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of all case reports of PID in San Francisco from 2004 to 2009 through our passive case reporting surveillance system. We examined demographics as well as sexually transmitted disease history. Pearson χ and Fisher exact tests were used to assess significance in the trend analysis. RESULTS: There were 245 case reports over the 6-year period examined. There were no statistically significant differences over this period based on demographics. However, an increasing proportion of cases were diagnosed at the municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic. DISCUSSION: PID is an important intermediary to assess the impact in reducing infertility in areas where chlamydia screening programs have been implemented. As the locus of PID care has shifted from inpatient to outpatient settings, passive PID surveillance has not adjusted. Efforts should be made to increase provider awareness that pelvic inflammatory disease is a notifiable condition and improve reporting among providers by devoting resources to either improving current passive surveillance or to the development of new innovative ways to conduct PID surveillance.