Literature DB >> 20660427

Representation of the ipsilateral visual field by neurons in the macaque lateral intraparietal cortex depends on the forebrain commissures.

Catherine A Dunn1, Carol L Colby.   

Abstract

Our eyes are constantly moving, allowing us to attend to different visual objects in the environment. With each eye movement, a given object activates an entirely new set of visual neurons, yet we perceive a stable scene. One neural mechanism that may contribute to visual stability is remapping. Neurons in several brain regions respond to visual stimuli presented outside the receptive field when an eye movement brings the stimulated location into the receptive field. The stored representation of a visual stimulus is remapped, or updated, in conjunction with the saccade. Remapping depends on neurons being able to receive visual information from outside the classic receptive field. In previous studies, we asked whether remapping across hemifields depends on the forebrain commissures. We found that, when the forebrain commissures are transected, behavior dependent on accurate spatial updating is initially impaired but recovers over time. Moreover, neurons in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) continue to remap information across hemifields in the absence of the forebrain commissures. One possible explanation for the preserved across-hemifield remapping in split-brain animals is that neurons in a single hemisphere could represent visual information from both visual fields. In the present study, we measured receptive fields of LIP neurons in split-brain monkeys and compared them with receptive fields in intact monkeys. We found a small number of neurons with bilateral receptive fields in the intact monkeys. In contrast, we found no such neurons in the split-brain animals. We conclude that bilateral representations in area LIP following forebrain commissures transection cannot account for remapping across hemifields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660427      PMCID: PMC2997031          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00752.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades.

Authors:  Kae Nakamura; Carol L Colby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A rapid and precise on-response in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  James W Bisley; B Suresh Krishna; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contributions of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  C G Gross; D B Bender; M Mishkin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-08-12       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Corticopontine visual projections in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  M Glickstein; J L Cohen; B Dixon; A Gibson; M Hollins; E Labossiere; F Robinson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Visual pontocerebellar projections in the cat.

Authors:  G Mower; A Gibson; F Robinson; J Stein; M Glickstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Autoradiographic studies of the projections of the midbrain reticular formation: descending projections of nucleus cuneiformis.

Authors:  S B Edwards
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque.

Authors:  C G Gross; C E Rocha-Miranda; D B Bender
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  C G Gross; D B Bender; C E Rocha-Miranda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis.

Authors:  S Ben Hamed; J R Duhamel; F Bremmer; W Graf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Clower; R A West; J C Lynch; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Shape selectivity and remapping in dorsal stream visual area LIP.

Authors:  Janani Subramanian; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Circuits for Action and Cognition: A View from the Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  Michele A Basso; Paul J May
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  Excitatory synaptic feedback from the motor layer to the sensory layers of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Nima Ghitani; Peter O Bayguinov; Corinne R Vokoun; Shane McMahon; Meyer B Jackson; Michele A Basso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dynamic shifts of visual and saccadic signals in prefrontal cortical regions 8Ar and FEF.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanna; Jonathan A Scott; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A novel, variable angle guide grid for neuronal activity studies.

Authors:  Thomas Talbot; David Ide; Ning Liu; Janita Turchi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.