Literature DB >> 20660414

Specificity of intramuscular activation during rhythms produced by spinal patterning systems in the in vitro neonatal rat with hindlimb attached preparation.

David A Klein1, Matthew C Tresch.   

Abstract

In intact adult vertebrates, muscles can be activated with a high degree of specificity, so that even within a single traditionally defined muscle, groups of motor units can be differentially activated. Such differential activation might reflect detailed control by descending systems, potentially resulting from postnatal experience such that activation of motor units is precisely tailored to their mechanical actions. Here we examine the degree to which such specific activation can be seen in the rhythmic patterns produced by isolated spinal motor systems in neonates. We examined motor output produced by the in vitro neonatal rat spinal cord with hindlimb attached. We recorded the activity of different regions within the posterior portion of biceps femoris (BFp; i.e., excluding the anterior/vertebral head). We found that in the rhythms evoked by bath application of serotonin/N-methyl-d-aspartate (5-HT/NMDA), all regions of BFp were active during extension. However, the regions of BFp were activated in a specific sequence, with the activation of rostral regions consistently preceding those of more caudal regions in both afferented and deafferented preparations. In the rhythms evoked by cauda equina (CE) stimulation, rostral and middle regions of BFp remained active in extension, but the caudal region of BFp was usually active in flexion. Stimulation of L5 and S2 dorsal roots typically evoked rhythms with all regions of BFp active during extension; although the same rostral to caudal sequence of activation observed in 5-HT/NMDA evoked rhythms could also be observed in these rhythms, we also observed cases with reversed sequences, with activity proceeding from caudal to rostral. S2 dorsal root stimulation occasionally evoked rhythms with flexor activity in caudal BFp, similar to CE-evoked rhythms. Taken together, these results suggest a high degree of individuated control of muscles by spinal pattern generating networks, even at birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660414      PMCID: PMC2957453          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00477.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

Review 1.  Motor pattern deletions and modular organization of turtle spinal cord.

Authors:  Paul S G Stein
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-07-31

2.  An in vitro spinal cord-hindlimb preparation for studying behaviorally relevant rat locomotor function.

Authors:  Heather Brant Hayes; Young-Hui Chang; Shawn Hochman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Anthony Jarc; Emilio Bizzi; Matthew C Tresch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The recruitment of different compartments within a muscle depends on the mechanics of the movement.

Authors:  James M Wakeling
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Modulation of phasic and tonic muscle synergies with reaching direction and speed.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Laure Fernandez; Alessandro Portone; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Primitives, premotor drives, and pattern generation: a combined computational and neuroethological perspective.

Authors:  Simon Giszter; Vidyangi Patil; Corey Hart
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Flexibility of motor pattern generation across stimulation conditions by the neonatal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  David A Klein; Angelica Patino; Matthew C Tresch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation.

Authors:  Jason J Kutch; Arthur D Kuo; Anthony M Bloch; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The case for and against muscle synergies.

Authors:  Matthew C Tresch; Anthony Jarc
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The motor output of hindlimb innervating segments of the spinal cord is modulated by cholinergic activation of rostrally projecting sacral relay neurons.

Authors:  Alex Etlin; Eran Finkel; Meir Cherniak; Aharon Lev-Tov; Lili Anglister
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 3.444

2.  Force-sensitive afferents recruited during stance encode sensory depression in the contralateral swinging limb during locomotion.

Authors:  Shawn Hochman; Heather Brant Hayes; Iris Speigel; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Spontaneous locomotor activity in late-stage chicken embryos is modified by stretch of leg muscles.

Authors:  Nina S Bradley; Young U Ryu; Marie C Yeseta
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Enabling techniques for in vitro studies on mammalian spinal locomotor mechanisms.

Authors:  Shawn Hochman; Elizabeth A Gozal; Heather B Hayes; JoAnna T Anderson; Stephen P DeWeerth; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 5.  The sacral networks and neural pathways used to elicit lumbar motor rhythm in the rodent spinal cord.

Authors:  Meir Cherniak; Alex Etlin; Ido Strauss; Lili Anglister; Aharon Lev-Tov
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.