Literature DB >> 20660390

Isochronous assessment of cardiac metabolism and function in mice using hybrid PET/MRI.

Katharina Büscher1, Martin S Judenhofer, Michael T Kuhlmann, Sven Hermann, Hans F Wehrl, Klaus P Schäfers, Michael Schäfers, Bernd J Pichler, Lars Stegger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Recently, integrated small-animal PET/MRI prototypes that provide isochronous and coregistered datasets of morphology and function through the simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI data have been developed. However, the need for MRI compatibility can constrain the technical design of the PET components and may lead to a lower sensitivity and lower spatial and temporal resolutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of a prototype preclinical PET/MRI system for the simultaneous assessment of cardiac metabolism and function in mice. A stand-alone high-resolution small-animal PET scanner using the same evaluation protocols was used as a reference.
METHODS: Simultaneous PET/MR images of an infarct mouse model (21 animals plus 3 controls) were acquired. The imaging performance of the MRI-compatible PET insert was evaluated with respect to count sensitivity; myocardium-to-background contrast; suitability for the analysis of global left ventricular function; and uptake difference in scar, border-zone, and remote regions. The radiotracer (18)F-FDG was used to acquire cardiac gated PET data, applying retrospective coincidence sorting. The PET insert data were coregistered to the MR images by determination of the appropriate transformation matrix.
RESULTS: An optimal registration of PET and MR images from the integrated system was achieved, and the reconstructed images showed a good visual correspondence in infarct areas between PET and MRI data. As expected, the PET insert showed a poorer performance with respect to counting rate and myocardium-to-background ratio than did the high-resolution PET. Assessment of left ventricular volumes was possible with the current PET/MRI prototype. A good correlation was found between PET and MRI (R > 0.95). Local PET uptake was successfully determined for different tissue, and a differentiation among remote, border-zone, and scar tissue was possible. However, the uptake difference for the PET/MRI prototype was lower than that for the high-resolution stand-alone PET system.
CONCLUSION: A hybrid PET/MRI prototype was successfully used to assess cardiac parameters in an infarct mouse model, although performance was reduced when compared with a high-resolution animal PET scanner. Future technical improvements are expected to result in comparable performance while providing higher registration accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660390     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.076448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  12 in total

1.  Feasibility of sequential PET/MRI using a state-of-the-art small animal PET and a 1 T benchtop MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Schmid; Jennifer Schmitz; Julia G Mannheim; Florian C Maier; Kerstin Fuchs; Hans F Wehrl; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  New frontiers and developing applications in 19F NMR.

Authors:  Jian-Xin Yu; Rami R Hallac; Srinivas Chiguru; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 3.  Positron emission tomography/MRI for cardiac diseases assessment.

Authors:  Osamu Manabe; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  State of the Art in Cardiac Hybrid Technology: PET/MR.

Authors:  Carmela Nappi; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Data processing of 3D and 4D in-vivo electron paramagnetic resonance imaging co-registered with ultrasound. 3D printing as a registration tool.

Authors:  M Gonet; B Epel; M Elas
Journal:  Comput Electr Eng       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.818

6.  PET/MRI of inflammation in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Won Woo Lee; Brett Marinelli; Anja M van der Laan; Brena F Sena; Rostic Gorbatov; Florian Leuschner; Partha Dutta; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Takuya Ueno; Mark P V Begieneman; Hans W M Niessen; Jan J Piek; Claudio Vinegoni; Mikael J Pittet; Filip K Swirski; Ahmed Tawakol; Marcelo Di Carli; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Cardiac PET, CT, and MR: what are the advantages of hybrid imaging?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Technical performance evaluation of a human brain PET/MRI system.

Authors:  Armin Kolb; Hans F Wehrl; Matthias Hofmann; Martin S Judenhofer; Lars Eriksson; Ralf Ladebeck; Matthias P Lichy; Larry Byars; Christian Michel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Matthias Schmand; Claus D Claussen; Vesna Sossi; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Whole-Body Atherosclerosis Imaging by Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Mice to Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Carlos Pérez-Medina; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 10.  Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance: a novel technique for the in vivo assessment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Marie A Schroeder; Kieran Clarke; Stefan Neubauer; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.